NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Whipp v R [2024] NSWCCA 79 Hearing dates: 27 March 2024 Decision date: 24 May 2024 Before: Davies J at [1]; Button J at [2]; Sweeney J at [77] Decision: 1) Leave to appeal granted, and appeal against sentence upheld. 2) Sentences imposed at first instance quashed. 3) For the first count of armed robbery, the applicant is sentenced to a non-parole period of 2 years 9 months, to commence on 5 March 2022 and concluded on 4 December 2024, to be followed by a parole period of 1 year 9 months, to conclude on 4 September 2026. 4) For the second count of using an offensive weapon with intent to assault in company, the applicant is sentenced to a fixed term of imprisonment for 2 years, to commence on 5 March 2022 and that expired on 4 March 2024. 5) The first date upon which it appears that the applicant is eligible for possible release to parole is 4 December 2024. Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – appeal against sentence – armed robbery – whether sentencing judge erred in failing to take account of the effect of the applicant's mental health on the onerousness of full-time custody – where applicant suffers complex PTSD as a result of grave offences committed against him in juvenile detention – sentencing not reduced to "tick a box" process – necessary for sentencing judge to engage with significant submissions – topic of custody being more onerous because of applicant's mental condition not specifically addressed – appeal allowed – applicant resentenced Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 33B, 97(1) Cases Cited: Betts v The Queen (2016) 258 CLR 420; [2016] HCA 25 Bugmy v R (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 Dellow v R [2020] NSWCCA 301 Egan v R [2017] NSWCCA 206 Prince v R [2020] NSWCCA 268 Sypher v R [2020] NSWCCA 336 Wood v R [2019] NSWCCA 309 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Peter Whipp (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Roy (Applicant) S Traynor (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate