NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Mustapha v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2024] NSWCATAD 150 Hearing dates: 1 March 2024 Date of orders: 30 May 2024 Decision date: 30 May 2024 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: J D Little, Senior Member Decision: (1) The Decision under review is set aside. (2) A contractor licence in the categories of Plumber, Drainer, Gasfitter and LP Gasfitter is to be issued to the Applicant under the Home Building Act 1989 (NSW). Catchwords: PROFESSIONS AND TRADES – Whether Applicant is disqualified under sections 20(1)(c) and 33A of Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) – Whether offence involving honesty should be ignored under section 33A(2) of Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) – Whether Applicant is a fit and proper person to hold contractor licence under sections 20(1)(a) and 20(1A) of Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) Home Building Regulation 2014 (NSW) Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 Bek v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2004] NSWADT 149 Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1979) 24 ALR 577 Farah v Director General, Department of Finance and Services [2014] NSWCATAP 23 Gambino v Commissioner for NSW Fair Trading [2014] NSWCATOD 135 Grenfell v Director General Department of Finance and Services [2013] NSWADT 57 Hughes and Vale Pty Ltd v The State of New South Wales (1955) 93 CLR 127 Hunt v Director General, Department of Services Technology and Administration [2010] NSWADT 186 Livaja v Commissioner for Fair Trading, Department of Finance, Services and Innovation [2020] NSWCATOD 17 Luk v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police [2019] NSWCATAP 23 Paul Voutef v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2023] NSWCATOD 79 Salcedo v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2016] NSWCATOD 19 Sobey v Commercial and Private Agents Board (1979) SASR 70 AT 76 Ziems v The Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales (1957) 97 CLR 279 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hamza Mustapha (Applicant) Commissioner for Fair Trading (Respondent) Representation: Applicant (Self-Represented) J Coss (Respondent) File Number(s): 2023/00349565 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate