NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Mearth Technology Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 656 Hearing dates: 8 May 2024 Date of orders: 29 May 2024 Decision date: 29 May 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: McGrath J Decision: The amended originating process filed 1 March 2024 is dismissed and the plaintiff is to pay the costs of the defendant. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – winding up – statutory demand – application to set aside – whether the statutory demand ought to be set aside because the alleged multiple debts are expressed as a single amount – whether the whole of the alleged debts were due and payable – whether the expression of the debt in a foreign currency constitutes a defect in the statutory demand – HELD – application to set aside statutory demand dismissed; no substantial injustice caused Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 459E, 459G, 459H, 459J Cases Cited: Aldridge Electrical Industries Pty Ltd v Mobitec AB (2001) 39 ACSR 287; [2001] NSWSC 823 AR Pilot Pty Ltd v Gouriotis [2007] NSWSC 396 Chippendale Printing Co Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1995) 55 FCR 562 Condor Asset Management Ltd v Excelsior Eastern Ltd (2005) 56 ACSR 223; [2005] NSWSC 1139 Daewoo Australia Pty Ltd v Suncorp-Metway Ltd (2000) 48 NSWLR 692; [2000] NSWSC 35 In the matter of Australian Institute of Fitness (Vic & Tas) Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 1143 In the matter of Gemi 169 Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 615 In the matter of MK Group Phoenix Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1467 In the matter of Tuffrock Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 738 Jolley v Mainka (1933) 49 CLR 242 Kisimul Holdings Pty Ltd v Clear Position Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 262 NT Resorts Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1998) 153 ALR 359 Portrait Express (Sales) Pty Ltd v Kodak (Australasia) Pty Ltd (1996) 20 ACSR 746; [1996] NSWSC 199 Re YCH Logistics (Australia) Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 1874Main Camp Tea Tree Oil Ltd v Australian Rural Group (2002) 20 ACLC 726; [2002] NSWSC 219 Topfelt Pty Ltd v State Bank of New South Wales Ltd (1993) 47 FCR 226 Vehicle Wash Systems Pty Ltd v Mark VII Equipment Inc (1997) 25 ACSR 709; (1997) 80 FCR 571 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mearth Technology Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) 40Seas Inc (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: R Hudson (Plaintiff) N Bailey (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate