NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Metro Environmental Logistics Pty Ltd v Newcastle Port Corporation (No 4) [2024] NSWSC 657 Hearing dates: 28 May 2024 Date of orders: 28 May 2024 Decision date: 29 May 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Stevenson J Decision: Unredacted copies of litigation funding agreement not to be provided to defendant Catchwords: COSTS – security for costs – relevant factors – whether ordering security would stultify proceedings – belated production of litigation funding agreement with private lenders – agreement produced with redactions – whether unredacted copy should be made available to defendant EVIDENCE – privileges – legal professional privilege – where litigation funding agreement in non-representative proceedings – whether details of manner in which lenders might share in claim proceeds should be disclosed to defendant – whether clauses were subject to legal professional privilege – whether clauses contained commercially sensitive information – whether disclosure would confer tactical advantage on defendant – relevance of provision in Practice Note SC Gen 17 concerning redaction of funding agreements to conceal information that might confer tactical advantage on defendant Cases Cited: Coffs Harbour City Council v Australian and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (t/as ANZ Investment Bank) [2016] FCA 306 Texts Cited: Practice Note SC Gen 17 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Metro Environmental Logistics Pty Ltd (Plaintiff/Respondent) Newcastle Port Corporation trading as Port Authority of New South Wales (Defendant/Applicant) Representation: Counsel: S T White SC / D Tynan (Plaintiff/Respondent) J A Hogan-Doran SC / A A Cameron (Defendant/Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate