NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: PN v R [2024] NSWCCA 86 Hearing dates: 17 April 2024 Date of orders: 5 June 2024 Decision date: 05 June 2024 Before: Wilson J at [1]; Chen J at [76]; Huggett J at [77] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal is granted; (2) The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – appeal against sentence – child sexual assault offences – where indicative term for a count relating to anal penetration was higher than the indicative term for counts relating to vaginal penetration – where applicant argues this indicates error by sentencing judge – whether ratio of indicative sentences establishes error – question of manifest excess Legislation Cited: Child Protection (Offenders Registration) Act 2000 (NSW) Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW), s 15A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 3, 9, 33, 53A Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 66A, 66DA, 66EB, 91G Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), ss 16B, 16BA Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), ss 5, 6 Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), s 474.22A Cases Cited: AJ v R [2023] NSWCCA 158 Clarke v R [2023] NSWCCA 170 Cullen v R [2014] NSWCCA 162 Davidson v R (2022) 300 A Crim R 214; [2022] NSWCCA 153 Grange v R [2023] NSWCCA 6 Hraichie v R [2022] NSWCCA 155 JM v R [2014] NSWCCA 297 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Maxwell v R [2020] NSWCCA 94 Obeid v R (2017) 96 NSWLR 155; [2017] NSWCCA 221 PC v R [2022] NSWCCA 107 R v BH [2023] NSWCCA 278 R v Clarke [2013] NSWCCA 260 R v CMB [2014] NSWCCA 5 R v Gavel [2014] NSWCCA 56 R v JJ [2009] NSWCCA 148 R v M.A.K., R v M.S.K. (2006) 167 A Crim R 159; [2006] NSWCCA 381 R v McNaughton (2006) 66 NSWLR 566; [2006] NSWCCA 242 R v MJB [2014] NSWCCA 195 R v Van Ryn [2016] NSWCCA 1 R v Wheeler [2000] NSWCCA 34 R v Cahyadi (2007) 168 A Crim R 41; [2007] NSWCCA 1 Ryan v R [2019] NSWCCA 200 Salama v R [2023] NSWCCA 141 SW v R [2013] NSWCCA 255 Category: Principal judgment Parties: PN (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Odgers SC (Applicant) A Bonnor (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate