NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Willmott v Adamo [2024] NSWSC 682 Hearing dates: 15 May 2024 Date of orders: 05 June 2024 Decision date: 05 June 2024 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Cavanagh J Decision: See [82] Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – service outside Australia – application for leave to proceed and default judgment against the fourth defendant – whether the fourth defendant validly served with the statement of claim – where the fourth defendant is a dissolved company formerly registered in the United States of America – where the plaintiff relies upon UCPR pts 11, 11A and the Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters – whether the plaintiff is able to rely upon pt 11A in circumstances where the originating process was not served pursuant to a request by the Registrar of this Court – whether the fourth defendant was served in accordance with New Hampshire law – whether the requirement to serve a notice in accordance with r 11.7 of the UCPR should be dispensed with – whether the fourth defendant's dissolved status prevents the plaintiff from proceeding against it Legislation Cited: Australian Consumer Law, ss 138, 271, 272 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 11.4, 11.5, 11.7, 11.8AA, 11.8AB, 11.8AC, 11A.4, 11A.5, 11A.6, 11A.8, sch 6 Cases Cited: Agar v Hyde (2000) 201 CLR 552 Bingley-Pullen v Montgomery [2018] NSWSC 1308 Hutchinson v AD Securities America LLC [2021] NSWSC 1573 Maloney v The Queen (2013) 252 CLR 168 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh (1995) 183 CLR 273 Nitro Circus Touring Australia Pty Ltd v Lenzoni [2016] NSWSC 178 Rossiter v Core Mining Limited [2015] NSWSC 360 Texts Cited: Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters (1965), art 10 New Hampshire Revised Statutes, §304C:5, §304-C:37, §304C:137, §304-C:144, §510:2, §510:13 New Hampshire Supreme Court Rules, r 26 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Claire Willmott (Plaintiff) Shona Adamo (First Defendant) Matthew Adamo (Second Defendant) Runstar Pty Ltd t/as Peppertown Gold Coast (Third Defendant) Alien Flier LLC (Fourth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: JC Sheller SC and B Julienne (Plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate