NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Singh v Rasier Pacific Pty Ltd [2024] NSWCATCD 4 Hearing dates: 11 December 2023 Date of orders: 03 June 2024 Decision date: 03 June 2024 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: G Sarginson, Senior Member Decision: The Respondents, Rasier Pacific Pty Ltd and Uber B.V. are to pay the applicant Ranjit Singh the total amount of $10,000 by 28 days from the date of this decision. Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW---Consumer claim---Part 6A Fair Trading Act 1987(NSW)---Uber driver---Contract---Termination for breach---Whether conduct of driver justified termination---Damages---Loss of income Legislation Cited: Australian Consumer Law 2010 (NSW) Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) Cases Cited: Ahmad v Portier Pacific Pty Ltd [2023] NSWCATCD, unreported, 21 September 2023 Ali v Raisier Pacific VOF, [2023] NSWCATCD unreported, dated 3 August 2023 Attorney General NSW v Gatsby (2018) 99 NSWLR 1; [2018] NSWCA 245 Beechwood Homes (NSW) Pty Ltd v Hassos [2023] NSWCATAP 184 BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings (1977) 180 CLR 266 Burns v Corbett (2018) 265 CLR 304; [2018] HCA 15 Cherry v Steele-Park [2017] NSWCA 295 Citta Hobart Pty Ltd v Cawthorn (2022) 276 CLR 216; [2022] HCA 16 DB Homes Australia Pty Ltd v Kes [2019] NSWCATAP 221 Forklift Engineering Australia Pty Ltd v Powerlift (Nissan) Pty Ltd [2000] VSC 443 Koompahatoo Local Aboriginal Land Council v Sanpine Pty Limited [2007] HCA 61; (2007) 233 CLR 115 Lam v Steve Jarvin Motors Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCATAP 186 Productivity Partners Pty Ltd (trading as Captain Cook College) v ACCC [2023] FCAFC 54 Rehman v Rasier Pacific Pty Ltd [2024] NSWCATCD 3 Sabouni v Revelop Building and Developments Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 31 Tramways Advertising Pty Ltd v Luna Park (NSW) Pty Ltd (1938) 38 SR (NSW) 632 Volkswagen Group Australia Pty Ltd v Saad [2022] NSWCATAP 133 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ranjit Singh (Applicant) Rasier Pacific Pty Ltd (First Respondent) Uber B.V. (Second Respondent) Representation: R Singh, self-represented (Applicant) B Allen, solicitor (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate