NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Cornish v R [2024] NSWCCA 177 Hearing dates: 9 September 2024 Date of orders: 27 September 2024 Decision date: 27 September 2024 Before: Stern JA at [1] Davies J at [2] Ierace J at [63] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal. (2) Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – appeal against sentence – misapplication of principle – where applicant pleaded guilty to multiple counts of sexual intercourse without consent and common assault – where parties had been in intimate relationship – offending occurred as a result of victim terminating relationship - whether sentencing judge erred by failing to give full effect to the findings in relation to Bugmy – where applicant was found to have mental health conditions and a very harsh background – where applicant's moral culpability was reduced as a result of Bugmy factors but weight still given to specific and general deterrence – challenge to assessment of objective seriousness - where sentencing judge increased sentence but not objective seriousness (as applicant asserted) by reason of Form 1 matters – where applicant's knowledge of lack of consent arose from unreasonable belief in victim's consent – no error in assessment of objective seriousness – sentence not manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 33, 61, 61HA (repealed), 61HK, 61I Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW) s 13 Cases Cited: Attorney-General's application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (No 1) of 2002 (2002) 56 NSWLR 146; [2002] NSWCCA 518 Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 House v King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Lloyd v R [2022] NSWCCA 18 MF v R [2024] NSWCCA 42 Moore v R [2024] NSWCCA 115 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 R v Cook [2023] NSWCCA 9; (2023) 103 MVR 285 Saffin v R [2020] NSWCCA 246 Sypher v R [2020] NSWCCA 336 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jarrod Alan Cornish (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: K Hogan (Applicant) E Wilkins SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate