NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Medical Device Technologies Pty Ltd v Health Administration Corporation [2024] NSWCA 142 Hearing dates: 21 and 22 March 2024 Date of orders: 11 June 2024 Decision date: 11 June 2024 Before: Payne JA at [1]; Stern JA at [409]; Harrison JA at [410] Decision: (1) Appeal dismissed. (2) Appellant to pay the respondent's costs. Catchwords: CONTRACTS — express terms — incorporation of terms — whether purchaser's standard terms and conditions incorporated by reference into contract CONSUMER LAW — sale of goods — respiratory ventilators — whether purchaser made known particular purpose for which ventilators were required — whether there was an implied condition as to fitness for purpose — whether ventilators were suitable for use in any clinical setting CONSUMER LAW — misleading or deceptive conduct — whether vendor made misleading or deceptive representations — whether vendor provided purchaser user manual as an intermediary or principal Legislation Cited: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Sch 2 ss 18, 29, 236 Health Administration Act 1982 (NSW) Sale of Goods Act 1923 (NSW) ss 19, 37, 38 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) s 75A Cases Cited: Ashford Shire Council v Dependable Motors Pty Ltd (1960) 104 CLR 139 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd (2020) 278 FCR 450; [2020] FCAFC 130 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 640; [2013] HCA 54 Boensch v Pascoe (2019) 268 CLR 593; [2019] HCA 49 Brambles Holdings Ltd v Bathurst City Council (2001) 53 NSWLR 153; [2001] NSWCA 61 Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Ltd (2004) 218 CLR 592; [2004] HCA 60 Campbell v Backoffice Investments Pty Ltd (2009) 238 CLR 304; [2009] HCA 25 Campomar Sociedad, Limitada v Nike International Limited (2000) 202 CLR 45; [2000] HCA 12 Christopher Hill Ltd v Ashington Piggeries Ltd [1972] AC 441 David Jones Ltd v Willis (1934) 52 CLR 110 Global Sportsman Pty Ltd v Mirror Newspapers Pty Ltd (1984) 2 FCR 82; [1984] FCA 180 Google Inc v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2013) 249 CLR 435; [2013] HCA 1 Grant v Australian Knitting Mills Ltd (1935) 54 CLR 49 Henville v Walker (2001) 206 CLR 459; [2001] HCA 52 Hornsby Building Information Centre Pty Ltd v Sydney Building Information Centre Ltd (1978) 140 CLR 216; [1978] HCA 11 Kuru v State of New South Wales (2008) 236 CLR 1; [2008] HCA 26 Manchester Liners Ltd v Rea Ltd [1922] 2 AC 74 Noone (Director of Consumer Affairs Victoria) v Operation Smile (Australia) Inc (2012) 38 VR 569; [2012] VSCA 91 Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd (1982) 149 CLR 191; [1982] HCA 44 Scenic Tours Pty Ltd v Moore [2018] NSWCA 238 Self Care IP Holdings Pty Ltd v Allergan Australia Pty Ltd [2023] HCA 8 Taco Co of Australia Inc v Taco Bell Pty Ltd (1982) 42 ALR 177 Tre Cavalli Pty Ltd v Berry Rural Co Operative Society Ltd [2013] NSWCA 235 Texts Cited: RL Chatburn, "Computer control of mechanical ventilation" (2004) 49(5) Respir Care 507 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Medical Device Technologies Pty Ltd (appellant) Health Administration Corporation (respondent) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate