NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Carey [2024] NSWCCA 90 Hearing dates: 17 May 2024 Date of orders: 7 June 2024 Decision date: 07 June 2024 Before: Harrison CJ at CL at [1]; Hamill J at [7]; N Adams J at [85] Decision: (1) Allow the appeal. (2) Quash the sentence imposed by Williams DCJ on 15 December 2023. (3) In lieu thereof sentence the respondent to an aggregate sentence of 5 years and 9 months to commence on 25 March 2022 and expire on 24 December 2027. The non-parole period of 3 years and 6 months is to commence on 25 March 2022 and expire on 24 September 2025. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentencing – prosecution appeal – child sexual offences – whether aggregate sentence was manifestly inadequate – objective gravity of the crime – whether Court should exercise residual discretion not to intervene Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61M(1), 66C(2) Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), s 68A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 19, 21B, 21B(1), 25AA, 25AA(3), 44(2), 53A(2)(b), 54A, 54D Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5D(1) Cases Cited: Baker v R [2022] NSWCCA 195; (2022) 302 A Crim R 60 Carr v R [2020] NSWCCA 214 CMB v Attorney General of New South Wales (2015) 256 CLR 346; [2015] HCA 9 Dawkins v R [2018] NSWCCA 278 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1; [2010] NSWCCA 194 FB v R; R v FB [2011] NSWCCA 217 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 JM v R [2014] NSWCCA 297; (2014) 246 A Crim R 528 Lowndes v The Queen (1999) 195 CLR 665; [1999] HCA 29 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 MC v R [2017] NSWCCA 316; (2017) 271 A Crim R 83 O'Brien v R [2013] NSWCCA 197 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610; [1998] HCA 57 R v AA [2006] NSWCCA 55 R v Bugmy (No 2) [2014] NSWCCA 322; (2014) 247 A Crim R 556 R v Hookey [2018] NSWCCA 147 R v Hovell [2021] NSWDC 326 R v JW (2010) 77 NSWLR 7; [2010] NSWCCA 49 R v Khoury [2018] NSWCCA 223 R v Kijurina [2017] NSWCCA 117 R v Malloy [2018] NSWDC 477 R v MAK; R v MSK [2006] NSWCCA 381; (2006) 167 A Crim R 159 R v MJR (2002) 54 NSWLR 368; [2002] NSWCCA 129 R v Primmer [2020] NSWCCA 50 R v Toma [2018] NSWCCA 45 R v Tuhakaraina [2016] NSWCCA 81 SB v R [2022] NSWCCA 164 The Queen v Carroll (2002) 213 CLR 635; [2002] HCA 55 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Rex (Appellant) Mark Anthony Carey (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Bonnor (Appellant) N Funnell and M Hunter (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate