NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Sanmik Food Pvt Ltd v Alfa Laval Australia Pty Ltd; Alfa Laval Australia Pty Ltd v Sanmik Food Pvt Ltd [2024] NSWSC 698 Hearing dates: 16-17 May 2024; further written submissions 22 and 29 May 2024 Decision date: 07 June 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Stevenson J Decision: Defendant entitled to rely on its delivery of the Homogenizer and Filler as part of the supply under the Settlement Documents Catchwords: CONTRACTS – construction – principles – deed settling earlier proceedings – where earlier proceedings involved dispute about contract for sale by defendant vendor to plaintiff purchaser of coconut milk production plants – where dispute settled on basis of parties entering further agreement for sale of those plants – where defendant vendor had delivered to plaintiff purchaser two major components of the first plant – whether on proper construction of the settlement deed the delivered components were agreed to be part of the supply under the further agreement Cases Cited: Burness v Hill [2019] VSCA 94 Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of New South Wales (1982) 149 CLR 337; [1982] HCA 24 Directors of the London and South Western Railway Co v Blackmore (1870) LR 4 HL 610 DXC Eclipse Pty Ltd v Wildsmith [2023] NSWCA 98 Ecosse Property Holdings Pty Ltd v Gee Dee Nominees Pty Ltd (2017) 261 CLR 544; [2017] HCA 12 Electricity Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Ltd (2014) 251 CLR 640; [2014] HCA 7 Grant v John Grant & Sons Pty Ltd (1954) 91 CLR 112; [1954] HCA 23 Kelly v The Queen (2004) 218 CLR 216; [2004] HCA 12 Miles v Luneburger Franchising Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCA 248 Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd (2015) 256 CLR 104; [2015] HCA 37 Reardon Smith Line Ltd v Hansen-Tangen; Hansen-Tangen v Sanko Steamship Co [1976] 1 WLR 989; [1976] 3 All ER 570 Reid v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (2022) 109 NSWLR 149; [2022] NSWCA 134 Simic v New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation (2016) 260 CLR 85; [2016] HCA 47 Victoria v Tatts Group Ltd [2016] HCA 5 Walker Group Constructions Pty Ltd v Tzaneros Investments Pty Ltd (2017) 94 NSWLR 108; [2017] NSWCA 27 Texts Cited: P Herzfeld and T Prince, Interpretation (2nd ed, 2020, Thomson Reuters) K Lewison and D Hughes, The Interpretation of Contracts in Australia (1st ed, 2012, Thomson Reuters) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sanmik Food Pvt Ltd (First Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant) Sanmik Natural Food Pty Ltd (Second Plaintiff/Second Cross-Defendant) Alfa Laval Australia Pty Ltd (Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Representation: Counsel: A Horvath SC / R Jameson (Plaintiffs/Cross-Defendants) S A Lawrance SC (Defendant/Cross-Claimant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate