NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Hebbel Constructions Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 707 Hearing dates: 6 June 2024 Date of orders: 6 June 2024 Decision date: 06 June 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Black J Decision: Order made setting aside creditor's statutory demand. Order that Defendant to pay the Plaintiff's costs on an indemnity basis, as agreed or as assessed. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Whether the Court should dispense with rr 7.1-7.2 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) so as to permit director to represent company in proceedings. CORPORATIONS – Winding Up – Statutory demand – Application to set aside – whether there is some "other reason" under s 459J(1)(b) why the demand should be set aside – where issue of the demand is inconsistent with the statutory regime contemplated by Pt 5.4 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Legislation Cited: - Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), rr 7.1–7.2, 7.29 - Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 459H, 459J - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), s 56–57 Cases Cited: - Advice Central Professional Wealth Management Pty Ltd v HMW Planning Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 571 - Business Innovation Pty Ltd v Maddison Morgan & Bailey Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 1523 - Damjanovic v Maley (2002) 55 NSWLR 149; [2002] NSWCA 230 - El-Saeidy v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2019] NSWCA 289 - Elsmore Resources Ltd [2016] NSWSC 884 - Gujarat NRE Australia Pty Ltd v Williams [2006] NSWSC 211 - Hamoui v Hamoui [2021] NSWDC 162 - Hebbel Constructions Pty Ltd v Bitar Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 1594 - JSBG Developments Pty Ltd v Kozlowski (2009) 75 NSWLR 745; [2009] NSWSC 1128 - DB Mahaffy & Associates Pty Ltd v Mahaffy [2011] NSWSC 673 - Re Buildlux Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 614 - Re DB Mahaffy & Associates Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 776 - Re Gemi 169 Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 615 - Re Granite Power Ltd (admins apptd) [2019] NSWSC 1491 - Re Horizons (Asia) Pty Ltd (14 March 2022) - Re SM Project Developments Pty Ltd (in liq) [2017] NSWSC 1010 - in Re UGL Process Solutions Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 1256 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hebbel Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Bitar Pty Limited (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Klineberg/M Bui (Plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate