NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: BE v R [2024] NSWCCA 100 Hearing dates: 10 May 2024 Date of orders: 14 June 2024 Decision date: 14 June 2024 Before: Kirk JA; Davies J; Sweeney J Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal. (2) Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIME — appeals — appeal against sentence — whether attempt to stop co-offenders during murder — whether breach of rule in Browne v Dunn — no unfairness from any such breach — assessment of objective seriousness of offence — whether sentencing judge adequately took account of ADHD — ADHD not relevant to offence — whether sentencing judge took account of COVID-19 — COVID-19 issue not material — whether sentence was disproportionately harsh — sentence was proportionate to sustained and brutal murder of defenceless child Legislation Cited: Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW), ss 6, 15E, 19(1) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5DA Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 23, 44(2), 54D(3) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW). Cases Cited: AH v R [2013] NSWCCA 32 AL v R [2017] NSWCCA 34; (2017) 266 A Crim R 1 Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 Bugmy v The Queen [1990] HCA 18; (1990) 169 CLR 525 Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37; (2013) 249 CLR 571 Buxton v R [2017] NSWCCA 169 CC v R; R v CC [2021] NSWCCA 71; (2021) 289 A Crim R 453 DS v R; DM v R (2022) 109 NSWLR 82; [2022] NSWCCA 156 Knight v Maclean [2002] NSWCA 314 Lloyd v R [2022] NSWCCA 18 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 Munda v Western Australia [2013] HCA 38; (2013) 249 CLR 600 MWJ v The Queen [2005] HCA 74; (2005) 80 ALJR 329 Obeid v R [2017] NSWCCA 221; (2017) 96 NSWLR 155 R v BE [2023] NSWSC 1007 R v Birks (1990) 19 NSWLR 677 R v KS [2005] NSWCCA 87 R v Shahrouk [2014] NSWCCA 87; (2014) 241 A Crim R 274 R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534; (2001) 53 NSWLR 704 R v SLD [2002] NSWSC 758 R v SLD [2003] NSWCCA 310 R v X [2016] NSWCCA 265 RWB v R [2010] NSWCCA 147; (2010) 202 A Crim R 209 Suksa-Ngacharoen v R [2018] NSWCCA 142 TM v R [2023] NSWCCA 185 TYN v R [2009] NSWCCA 146 Vaiusu v R [2022] NSWCCA 283 Veen v The Queen (No 2) [1988] HCA 14; (1988) 164 CLR 465 Wass v R [2022] NSWCCA 143 Whipp v R [2024] NSWCCA 79 White v R [2016] NSWCCA 190; (2016) 261 A Crim R 302 Zreika v R [2012] NSWCCA 44; (2012) 223 A Crim R 460 Category: Principal judgment Parties: BE (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: SJ Odgers SC (Applicant) G Newton SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate