NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Hewitt v McClymont [2024] NSWSC 715 Hearing dates: 11 June 2024 Date of orders: 11 June 2024 Decision date: 11 June 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity - Expedition List Before: Rees J Decision: Orders made for removal of trustee; freezing order made. Catchwords: MAREVA ORDER – r 25.14(4), Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 – no issue of principle – unexplained withdrawal of funds by defendant trustee – no response by defendant to requests for information or trust deed – no substantive engagement by the defendant in proceedings – defendant sells real property while proceedings were on foot – $2M freezing order sought – order made for $810,000. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 98(4)(c) Uniform Civil Procedures 2005 (NSW), r 25.14(4) Cases Cited: Cardile v LED Builders Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 380; [1999] HCA 18 Clout (Trustee) v Anscor Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 174 Jackson v Sterling Industries Ltd (1987) 162 CLR 612 Marango Investments Pty Ltd v Kingdom Towers 4 Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 801 OXC Bidco Pty Ltd v Dickson [2016] NSWSC 968 Patterson v BTR Engineering (Aust) Ltd (1989) 18 NSWLR 319 Samimi v Seyedabadi; Seyedabadi v Samimi [2013] NSWCA 279 Tomasetti v Brailey [2012] NSWCA 6 Turner v Universal Home Loans Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 936 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Geoffrey Hewitt (Plaintiff) Scott Fain McClymont (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Liebhold (Plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate