NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kelly v R [2024] NSWCCA 101 Hearing dates: 8 May 2024; 3 June 2024 Date of orders: 17 June 2024 Decision date: 17 June 2024 Before: Bell CJ Hamill J Yehia J Decision: (1) Dismiss the appeal. (2) Confirm the orders of the District Court. Catchwords: CRIMINAL APPEALS – District Court convicting of summary or back up offence after trial – appeal under ss 5AD and 5AA Criminal Appeal Act – appeal in strict sense – where error of law must be established – amended grounds of appeal – where appellant convicted of negligent driving occasioning death – appellant a police officer involved in pursuit of motorbike – whether judge erred in failing to determine whether she took into account course of driving – where judge referred to earlier driving but found negligence at the time of the collision – no substance to ground of appeal – whether judge erred in finding negligence where there was no evidence that appellant failed to keep a safe distance – ample evidence to justify finding – whether primary judge took into account an irrelevant consideration – police safe driving policy – appellant's knowledge of driving in breach of part of policy and pursuit guidelines – whether judge did not refer to other breaches of the policy – whether judge failed to provide adequate reasons – judgment brief but provided amply adequate reasons Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 8(1) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), ss 5AA, 5AA(4), 5AA(7), 5AD, 5AD(1), 5AD(3) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), ss 165-168 Road Rules 2014 (NSW), regs 287, 305 Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW), ss 117, 117(3) Cases Cited: Bulga Underground Operations Pty Ltd v Nash (2016) 93 NSWLR 338; [2016] NSWCCA 37 Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163; [1995] HCA 58 Derrick v Cheung [2001] HCA 48; (2001) 181 ALR 301 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Yeo [2008] NSWSC 953; (2008) 188 A Crim R 82 Fleming v The Queen (1998) 197 CLR 250; [1998] HCA 68 Grasso Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd v SafeWork NSW; Grasso v SafeWork NSW [2021] NSWCCA 288 GS v R; Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v GS (2022) 107 NSWLR 618; [2022] NSWCCA 65 HD Projects Pty Ltd v SafeWork NSW [2022] NSWCCA 212 Landmark Roofing Pty Ltd v SafeWork NSW [2021] NSWCCA 95 Parker v R [2023] NSWCCA 234 Poletti Corporation Pty Ltd v SafeWork NSW [2020] NSWCCA 243 Prineas v R [2018] NSWCCA 221 The Queen v Lavender (2005) 222 CLR 67; [2005] HCA 37 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Matthew James Kelly (Appellant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Glissan KC and D Nagle (Appellant) S Lind (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate