NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hornsby Shire Council v Salman [2024] NSWCA 155 Hearing dates: 29 May 2024 Decision date: 27 June 2024 Before: White JA at [1]; Adamson JA at [34]; Basten AJA at [136] Decision: (1) Dismiss the appeal. (2) Order the appellant to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal. Catchwords: NEGLIGENCE — breach — foreseeability of risk — whether height differential between surfaces in a playground gave rise to a reasonably foreseeable risk of harm — whether height differential was readily discernible — where the Australian playground maintenance standards applied — where council was independently advised to take steps to mitigate risk — where council did not take reasonable precautions advised NEGLIGENCE — breach — obvious risk — whether height differential between different surfaces in a playground was obvious — assessment to be made in all the circumstances — where it was foreseeable that playground users would be distracted by children NEGLIGENCE — causation — factual causation — whether council's failure to top up mulch in playground to even out the surfaces caused the respondent's injury NEGLIGENCE — duty of care — formulation of risk — whether primary judge erred in identifying the risk of harm as the risk of falling and sustaining injury when walking between two surfaces in a playground — whether the risk of harm could be reformulated on appeal — necessary specificity of formulation of risk of harm APPEALS — point not taken below — where matters raised on appeal were not raised before the primary judge — where council's case on appeal differed substantially from the way in which it was conducted at first instance — extent to which parties are bound by the way in which their case was conducted at first instance Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 5B, 5C, 5D, 5G, Div 4 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 69 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 42.1 Cases Cited: Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd v Zaluzna (1987) 162 CLR 479; [1987] HCA 7 Blacktown City Council v Hocking [2008] NSWCA 144; [2008] Aust Torts Reports 81-956 Blue Op Partner Pty Ltd v De Roma [2023] NSWCA 161 Brodie v Singleton Shire Council (2001) 206 CLR 512; [2001] HCA 29 Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1; [1986] HCA 33 Endeavour Energy v Precision Helicopters Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 169; [2015] Aust Torts Reports 82-227 Ghantous v Hawkesbury City Council (2001) 206 CLR 512; [2001] HCA 29 Hackshaw v Shaw (1984) 155 CLR 614; [1984] HCA 84 Ho v Powell (2001) 51 NSWLR 572; [2001] NSWCA 168 Jolley v Sutton London Borough Council [2000] 1 WLR 1082; [2000] 3 All ER 409 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW (2018) 264 CLR 541; [2018] HCA 30 Multicon Engineering Pty Ltd v Federal Airports Corporation (1997) 47 NSWLR 631 Richmond Valley Council v Standing [2002] NSWCA 359; (2002) 127 LGERA 237 Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW v Dederer (2007) 234 CLR 330; [2007] HCA 42 Salman v Hornsby Shire Council [2023] NSWDC 506 Salman v Hornsby Shire Council (No 2) [2023] NSWDC 527 Smits v Roach (2006) 227 CLR 423; [2006] HCA 36 State Rail Authority v Brown (2006) 66 NSWLR 540; [2006] NSWCA 220 Swain v Waverley Municipal Council (2005) 220 CLR 517; [2005] HCA 4 Tapp v Australian Bushmans Camp Draft & Rodeo Association Limited (2022) 273 CLR 454; [2022] HCA 11 Thompson v Woolworths (Q'land) Pty Ltd (2005) 221 CLR 234; [2005] HCA 19 Vairy v Wyong Shire Council (2005) 223 CLR 422; [2005] HCA 62 Venues NSW v Kane [2023] NSWCA 192 Wallace v Kam (2013) 250 CLR 375; [2013] HCA 19 Water Board v Moustakas (1988) 180 CLR 491; [1988] HCA 12 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hornsby Shire Council (Appellant) Kathie Beatrice Salman (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: R Sheldon SC (Appellant) D A Lloyd SC / E P Anderson (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate