NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Davies [2024] NSWSC 786 Hearing dates: 7 June 2024 Date of orders: 28 June 2024 Decision date: 28 June 2024 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Walton J Decision: Sentenced to an aggregate sentence of 9 years imprisonment, to date from 6 May 2020 and expiring on 5 May 2029 with a non-parole period of 6 years, expiring on 5 May 2026. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence – manslaughter – objective features – objective seriousness – moral culpability – causal connection not necessary – social deprivation – contribution to mental health and tendency to violence – explain recourse to violence when frustrated – aggravating features – absence of planning – vulnerability of victim – hatred for prejudice against a group of people – criminal history – mitigation – plea of guilty – subjective circumstances – rehabilitation and remorse – general deterrence – s 166 matters – totality – special circumstances – aggregate sentence Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW) Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: Baumer v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 51 Benitez v R (2006) 160 A Crim R 166; [2006] NSWCCA 21 BM v R [2019] NSWCCA 223 Bugmy v the Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 Casey v R [2015] NSWCCA 142 Cheung v The Queen (2001) 209 CLR 1; [2001] HCA 67 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194 Dunn v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 312 Filippou v The Queen (2015) 256 CLR 47; [2015] HCA 29 GG v R [2018] NSWCCA 280 Goodbun v R [2020] NSWCCA 77 Goundar v R [2012] NSWCCA 87 Hawkins v R (1993) 67 A Crim R 64 Ibbs v The Queen (1987) 163 CLR 447; [1987] HCA 46 Katsis v R [2018] NSWCCA 9 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 McDowall v R [2019] NSWCCA 29 Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120; [2011] HCA 39 Nguyen v R [2021] NSWCCA 118 Paterson v R [2021] NSWCCA 273 Perkins v R [2018] NSWCCA 62 R v Blacklidge (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), Gleeson CJ (with whom Grove and Ireland JJ agreed), 12 December 1994, unrep) R v Borkowski (2009) 195 A Crim R 1; [2009] NSWCCA 102 R v Dodd (1991) 57 A Crim R 349 R v Doolan [2023] NSWSC 821 R v Geddes (1936) 36 SR (NSW) 554 R v Hoerler (2004) 147 A Crim R 520; [2004] NSWCCA 184 R v Imbornone [2017] NSWCCA 144 R v Irwin [2019] NSWCCA 133 R v Isaacs (1997) 41 NSWLR 374; (1997) 90 A Crim R 587 R v Loveridge (2014) 243 A Crim R 31; [2014] NSWCCA 120 R v McNeil (No 4) [2015] NSWSC 1198 R v MD, BM, NA, JT (2005) 156 A Crim R 372; [2005] NSWCCA 342 R v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270; [1999] HCA 54 R v Qutami [2001] NSWCCA 353; (2001) 127 A Crim R 369 R v Smith [2024] NSWSC 437 R v Troja (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), Kirby P, Grove and Newman J, 16 July 1991, unrep) R v Winefield [2011] NSWSC 337 Regina v Partington [2006] NSWSC 442 Regina v Scott [2005] NSWCCA 152 Regina v Tony Sandnes [2001] NSWCCA 385 Regina v Williams [2000] NSWCCA 136 Regina v XX (2009) 195 A Crim R 38; [2009] NSWCCA 115 Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465; [1988] HCA 14 Category: Sentence Parties: Rex (Crown) Anthony John Davies (Offender) Representation: Counsel: M Swift (Crown) S Corish (Offender)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate