NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Shapkin v The University of Sydney [2024] NSWCA 156 Hearing dates: 21 June 2024 Date of orders: 27 June 2024 Decision date: 27 June 2024 Before: Meagher JA at [1]; Griffiths AJA at [2] Decision: (1) The summons seeking leave to appeal is dismissed. (2) The applicant pay the first respondent's costs. Catchwords: APPEALS – Leave to appeal – where applicant brought concurrent appeal and judicial review proceedings in relation to decisions of NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal – where judicial review proceedings stayed – whether exercise of discretion to refuse to conduct judicial review pursuant to s 34(1)(c) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) miscarried – whether primary judge misapplied principle in Wishart v Fraser (1941) 64 CLR 470; [1941] HCA 8 – insufficient prospects to warrant grant of leave to appeal Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), ss 34(1)(c), 80, 83, Sch 4 cl 12(1) Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW), ss 8(1)(c), 11, 219 Residential Tenancies Regulation 2019 (NSW), reg 31 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101(2)(r) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 18.2, 59.4 Cases Cited: Allen v TriCare (Hastings) Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 416 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) v Valve Corp (No 4) [2016] FCA 382 BP v State of New South Wales [2019] NSWCA 223 Fong BHNF Fong v Weller [2024] NSWCA 46 Hill v King (1993) 31 NSWLR 654 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Hunter Quarries Pty Ltd v Mexon (2018) 98 NSWLR 526; [2018] NSWCA 178 Islam v Australian Real Estate Relations Pty Ltd [2023] NSWCA 131 Jabulani Pty Ltd v Walkabout II Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCA 267 Makowska v St George Community Housing Ltd [2022] NSWCA 5 Meagher v Stephenson (1993) 30 NSWLR 736 Mohareb v Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions NSW [2024] NSWCA 93 Navazi v New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation [2015] NSWCA 308 Sasterawan v Morris (2007) 69 NSWLR 547; [2007] NSWCCA 185 Shapkin v The University of Sydney (NCAT Consumer and Commercial Division, 4 October 2022, unrep) Shapkin v The University of Sydney [2023] NSWCATAP 2 Wishart v Fraser (1941) 64 CLR 470; [1941] HCA 8 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mr Vasiliy Shapkin (Applicant) The University of Sydney (First Respondent) NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: V Shapkin (Litigant-in-person) A Rao/J Pen (First Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate