NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Crisp v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2024] NSWCATAD 179 Hearing dates: 26 June 2024 Date of orders: 1 July 2024 Decision date: 01 July 2024 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: D Dinnen, Senior Member Decision: Leave is therefore refused under s 96(1) of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW). Catchwords: HUMAN RIGHTS – Discrimination – equal opportunity – leave required for complaint to proceed – principles applying to grant of leave – goods and services Legislation Cited: Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Police Service Act 1990 Cases Cited: Chalker v Murrays Australia Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCATAD 282 Dutt v Central Coast Area Health Service [2002] NSWADT 133 Ekermawi v Administrative Decisions Tribunal of New South Wales [2009] NSWSC 143 Jones v Ekermawi [2009] NSWCA 388 Langley v Niland [1981] 2 NSWLR 104 Prakash v Bobb Borg Enterprises Pty Ltd [1999] NSWADT 73 Robinson v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2013] FCA 770 Seltsam Pty Ltd v McGuiness [2000] NSWCA 29; (2000) 49 NSWLR 262 State of New South Wales v Whiteoak [2014] NSWCATAP 99 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gordon Crisp (Applicant) Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (Respondent) Representation: Appellant (self-represented)
Solicitors: Maddocks Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2024/00196845 Publication restriction: none
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate