NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Lambroglou [2024] NSWSC 829 Hearing dates: 6 June 2024 Date of orders: 9 July 2024 Decision date: 09 July 2024 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Davies J Decision: The offender is sentenced to an aggregate sentence of imprisonment for 4 years 6 months commencing 8 October 2022 and expiring 7 April 2027 with a non-parole period of 3 years expiring 7 October 2025. The offences on the s 166 Certificate are dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – sentence – three guilty pleas – accessory after the fact to murder, participate in a criminal group, proceeds of crime – where offender had known links to Comanchero Outlaw Motorcycle Gang (OMCG) – subject murder connected to ongoing feud between the OMCG and a family Organised Crime Network – two unknown shooters – offender responsible for affixing cloned number plates and positioning three getaway cars – murder unknown to him at the time – mid-range objective seriousness – offender later provided access to underground carpark to hide getaway car until it was subsequently removed and destroyed – by this time offender knew shooters had murdered the deceased – shooters not yet apprehended – low end of mid-range – over $500,000 found in offender's possession – offender was collecting and counting cash for OMCG – objective seriousness high in the mid-range – psychological report details childhood characterised by domestic and sexual violence – PTSD, persistent depressive disorder and various drug use disorder diagnoses – offender's account to the psychologist somewhat incomplete – limited criminal record – finding of remorse – good prospects of rehabilitation and low risk of reoffending – offender remained drug free in custody – general deterrence and retribution substantial considerations – special circumstances found given offender's pre-custody drug addiction – aggregate sentence imposed SENTENCING – plea of guilty – where offender offered to plead to accessory after the fact, participate in criminal group and proceeds of crime before committal – where Crown rejected and later accepted such an offer – complicated history given multiple changes to the indictment – offender entitled to 25% discount to accessory offence under s 25E(2) and (3) of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) – where criminal group charge was originally certified as an alternative to murder – appears on indictment ex-officio – exception in s 25D(3)(a) and (4) disentitles offender to 25% discount – facts and evidence establishing criminal group charge same as those contained in the brief of evidence – 10% discount – where three separate proceeds of crime offences totalling $561,450 were originally charged – no provision in Division 1A for where an offender offers to plead offer is rejected then accepted after committal – lacuna in Division 1A – inconsistent with EAPG system – offender entitled to 10% discount under s 25D(2)(b)(i) – pleas and agreed statement of facts otherwise demonstrate willingness to facilitate the course of justice Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 18, 93T, 193C, 316, 349 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 22A, 25D, 25E Cases Cited: Ah Keni v R [2021] NSWCCA 263; (2021) 292 A Crim R 311 Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 Doudar v R [2021] NSWCCA 37 Doyle v R (2022) 108 NSWLR 1; [2022] NSWCCA 81 Dukagjini v R [2023] NSWCCA 210 LN v R [2020] NSWCCA 131 Paxton v R [2011] NSWCCA 242; (2011) 219 A Crim R 104 R v De Simoni (1981) 147 CLR 383; [1981] HCA 31 R v Hamalainen [2020] NSWSC 1705 R v Johnson [2014] NSWSC 1254 R v McCloskey (No 5) [2020] NSWSC 1087 R v Struik [2023] NSWSC 1548 R v Ward [2004] NSWSC 420 Shi v R [2014] NSWCCA 276; (2014) 246 A Crim R 273 TT v R [2014] NSWCCA 206 Yacoub v R [2021] NSWCCA 166 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Crown Vincent Bill Lambroglou (Offender) Representation: Counsel: C Taylor (Crown) P Lange (Offender)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate