NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Naboulsi v Western Sydney Local Health District (No 2) [2024] NSWSC 836 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 10 July 2024 Decision date: 10 July 2024 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Schmidt AJ Decision: Order that the Health District bear Ms Naboulsi's costs of the extension application, as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: COSTS – party/party – whether there should be a departure from the general rule that costs follow the event – orders made under the Limitation Act extending the time for plaintiff to commence proceedings – defendant unsuccessfully resisted extension application on basis that delay precluded a fair trial – defendant bear plaintiff's costs of the extension application Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56 Limitation Act 1969 (NSW), ss 60F, 60J, 60L Cases Cited: Commonwealth of Australia v Smith [2005] NSWCA 478 Duncan v Commonwealth of Australia [2006] NSWSC 822 Holt v Wynter (2000) 49 NSWLR 128; [2000] NSWCA 143 Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534; [1990] HCA 59 Moubarak by his tutor Coorey v Holt (2019) 100 NSWLR 218; [2019] NSWCA 102 Naboulsi v Western Sydney Local Health District [2024] NSWSC 744 R v Edwards [2009] (2009) 83 ALJR 717; [2009] HCA 20 Spaulding v Commonwealth of Australia (No. 2) [2006] NSWSC 81 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Rouba Naboulsi (Applicant) Western Sydney Local Health District (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: E Romaniuk (Applicant) S Kettle (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate