NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Pemberton v Insurance and Care NSW [2024] NSWCATAD 191 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 12 July 2024 Decision date: 12 July 2024 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: K Robinson, Senior Member Decision: (1) The decision under review is affirmed. (2) Section 64 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 applies to the material filed by the Respondent on a confidential basis. That material is not to be released to either the Applicant or the public. (3) An oral hearing is dispensed with under s 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW – access to government information – freedom of information - conclusive overriding presumption against disclosure – legal professional privilege – client legal privilege - workplace investigation Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: AIN v Medical Council of New South Wales [2015] NSWCATAP 241 Jackson v University of New South Wales [2019] NSWCATAD 224 Moore v Southern NSW Local Health District [2024] NSWCATAD 72 Pratt Holdings Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2004) 136 FCR 357 Priest v State of New South Wales [2006] NSWSC 1281 Trade Practices Commission v Sterling (1979) 36 FLR 244 Whitaker v Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District [2018] NSWCATAD 183 Yee v Medical Council of NSW [2017] NSWCATAD 370 YG and GG v Minister for Community Services [2002] NSWCA 247 Texts Cited: None Cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: James Anthony Pemberton (Applicant) Insurance and Care NSW (Respondent) Representation: Applicant (Self-Represented) Crown Solicitor (Respondent) File Number(s): 2024/00067355 Publication restriction: Section 64 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 applies to the material filed by the Respondent on a confidential basis. That material is not to be released to either the Applicant or the public.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate