NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Clarkson [2024] NSWDC 283 Hearing dates: 3 July 2024 Date of orders: 12 July 2024 Decision date: 12 July 2024 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Newlinds SC DCJ Decision: I indicate the following sentences, after the 25% discount: (1) The Robbery charge – 3 Years, with a non- parole period of 2.25 years. (2) The 18 May primary charge – 4 years. (3) The 18 May s 166 charge – 9 months. (4) I indicate I would have wholly accumulated the 18 May Offences to 4 years with a non-parole period of 3 years. I impose an aggregate sentence of 5 years to commence on 13 February 2023. I impose a minimum non-parole period of 2.5 years commencing 13 February 2023 and expiring 12 August 2025. Catchwords: SENTENCING — Multiple separate offences — Robbery – Assault – Dishonesty – Accumulation, concurrency and totality – Aggregate sentences — Crushing sentence — Objective seriousness – Offender in custody at time of offending – Does s 56 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 apply – Policy considerations for offence committed in custody – s 25D(4)(a) – refusal of an offer to plead guilty Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 33B(1)(a); s 94(a); s 97(2); s 253E(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) S 3A; s 5; s 21A(3)(c); s 21A(2)(d); s 25D; s 25D(4)(a); s 25D(4)(b); s 56(1)(a); s 56(1)(b); s 56(2); s 56(3) Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 s 3; s 4 Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194 Hraichie v The Queen [2022] NSWCCA 155 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Hemsley [2004] NSWCCA 228 R v Henry [1999] NSWCCA 111 R v Holder [1983] 3 NSWLR 245 R v Jeremiah [2016] NSWCCA 241 R v Jeremiah [2016] NSWCCA 241 R v MAK [2006] NSWCCA 381 R v Wang (No. 1) [2020] NSWSC 1255, R v Windle [2012] NSWCCA 222 Shaw v The Queen [2008] NSWCCA 58 Stanton v R [2017] NSWCCA 250 Williams v R [2012] NSWCCA 172 ZA v R [2017] NSWCCA 132 Category: Sentence Parties: Rex Stuart Clarkson (Offender) Representation: Counsel: T Bicanic (Crown) D Pace (Defence)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate