NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Diallo & Ors (No 2) [2024] NSWSC 853 Hearing dates: 1-3 July 2024 Date of orders: 15 July 2024 Decision date: 15 July 2024 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hamill J Decision: The evidence of YA's statement recorded on the body worn video is inadmissible Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – evidence – admissions by conduct – lies and consciousness of guilt – statements made by accused near the scene of the murder – no adult, lawyer or support person present – statutory prohibition on admissibility – whether exception to prohibition established – where questions asked in urgent circumstances – accused member of suburban gang – differences leading to violent confrontation – overview of prosecution case – eye witness testimony by other witnesses – taking the contempt charge rather than an affirmation or oath – repeated mantra of "no comment" – circumstantial case – assessment of accused's vulnerability – palpable fear and confusion – satisfactory explanation of absence of adult – a lot happening – other factors militating against admission of evidence – evidence not admissible Legislation Cited: Child Welfare Act 1939 (NSW), s 81C Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW), ss 3, 13, 13(1)(a), 13(1)(b) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 128 Cases Cited: McAuliffe v The Queen (1995) 183 CLR 108; [1995] HCA 37 Miller v The Queen; Smith v The Queen; Presley v Director of Public Prosecutions (SA) (2016) 259 CLR 380; [2016] HCA 30 Mitchell v The King; Rigney v The King; Carver v The King; Tenhoopen v The King (2023) 276 CLR 299; [2023] HCA 5 R v Basha (1989) 39 A Crim R 337 R v Dunn (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 15 April 1992, unrep) R v H (A child) (1996) 85 A Crim R 481 R v Jogee [2017] AC 387; [2016] UKSC 8 R v KS (No 2) [2023] NSWSC 1475 R v Phung and Huynh [2001] NSWSC 115 R v Warren [1982] 2 NSWLR 360; (1982) 5 A Crim R 321 R v Williams (Supreme Court (NSW), 9 August 1982, unrep) Texts Cited: N/A Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Rex (Prosecution) Ibrahima Diallo (Defendant) AG (Defendant) YA (Defendant) AD (Defendant) Panashe Morgan Ryan Karise (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: E Balodis and J Sfinas (Rex) R Wilson SC (Diallo) M Avenell SC (AG) W Terracini SC KC and P Kondich (YA) B Robinson (AD) M Smith (Karise)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate