NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Bentancur v Mammoliti (No.2) [2024] NSWDC 286 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 15 July 2024 Decision date: 15 July 2024 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Abadee DCJ Decision: See paragraph [74] Catchwords: COSTS – plaintiff's application for partial order for indemnity costs based on defendant's rejection of either Calderbank offer or rules offer – whether unreasonable for defendant to reject Calderbank offer – whether rules offer invalidated for want of compliance with r 20.26(5)(b) of Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 98(1) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 20.26, 42.14 Cases Cited: Bentancur v Mammoliti [2024] NSWDC 201 Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 All ER 333 Cessnock City Council v 123 259 932 Pty Ltd [2024] HCA 17 Chaina v Alvaro Homes Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 353 Commonwealth v Gretton [2008] NSWCA 117 Hagerty v Hills Central Pty Ltd (No.2) [2018] NSWCA 279 Patterson & Anor v Mamou t/as De Novo Conveyancing (No.2) [2024] NSWDC 75 Re Earth Civil Australia [2021] NSWSC 1161 Texts Cited: J Hamilton, G Lindsay and C Webster New South Wales Civil Procedure Handbook 2023 (Lawbook Co, 2023) Category: Costs Parties: Mr Danys Bentancur (Plaintiff) Mr Giovanni John Mammoliti (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr T Cleary (Plaintiff) Ms C Langford (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate