NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Jordan; R v Field [2024] NSWDC 287 Hearing dates: 19 March 2024 Decision date: 06 May 2024 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Coleman SC DCJ Decision: (1) In respect of Mr Jordan: (a) Pursuant to s 29(1)(a) of the Act, the defendant has derived a benefit in connection with drug trafficking. (b) Pursuant to s 29(1)(b) of the Act, the value of such benefit is $100,000. (c) Pursuant to s 29(1)(c) of the Act, order the defendant pay to the State a pecuniary penalty of $100,000. (2) In respect of Mr Field: (a) Pursuant to s 29(1)(a), the defendant has derived a benefit in connection with drug trafficking. (b) Pursuant to s 29(1)(b) of the Act, the value of such benefit is $100,000. (c) Pursuant to s 29(1)(c) of the Act, order the defendant pay to the State a pecuniary penalty of $100,000. Catchwords: CRIME — Confiscations — Forfeiture order — Proceeds of indictable offence or instrument of serious offence Legislation Cited: Confiscation of Proceeds of Crime Act 1989 (NSW) s 4, 13(3), 29, 30. Cases Cited: Regina v Hall [2013] NSWCCA 47. Texts Cited: NA Category: Costs Parties: Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (ODPP) Glen Jordan Jake Field Representation: Solicitor: M Dixon (NSW) (Crown)
G Jordan (self-represented) J Field (self-represented) File Number(s): 2021/00197398 2021/00293798 Publication restriction: NA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate