NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Golding v R [2024] NSWCCA 129 Hearing dates: 7 June 2024 Date of orders: 17 July 2024 Decision date: 17 July 2024 Before: Basten AJA at [1]; N Adams J at [59]; Huggett J at [68] Decision: Pursuant to r 4.15 of the Supreme Court (Criminal Appeal) Rules 2021, refuse the applicant leave to appeal on the ground contained in the proposed notice of appeal. Catchwords: CRIME – appeal against conviction – leave to appeal– challenge to jury directions – no objection taken at trial to proposed directions – no redirection or further direction sought – whether miscarriage of justice – application of Supreme Court (Criminal Appeal) Rules 2021, r 4.15 CRIME – miscarriage of justice – tendency evidence – context evidence – single count indictment – evidence of uncharged incident admitted as tendency and context evidence – jury directed to disregard evidence of uncharged incident if not satisfied it occurred – whether jury required to be directed that doubt as to uncharged incident should be considered in assessing complainant's evidence as to charge – inconsistency between Markuleski direction and proper consideration of tendency evidence and context evidence Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6(1) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), ss 161A, 293A(2) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 97, 101 Jury Directions Act 2015 (Vic), ss 61, 62 Supreme Court (Criminal Appeal) Rules 2021 (NSW), r 4.15 Cases Cited: Astill v R [2024] NSWCCA 118 Day v Rex (No 2) [2023] NSWCCA 312 Greenhalgh v R [2017] NSWCCA 94 Nudd v The Queen (2006) 80 ALJR 614; [2006] HCA 9 Obeid v R (2017) 96 NSWLR 155; [2017] NSWCCA 221 Regina v GAR [2003] NSWCCA 224 Roos v R [2019] NSWCCA 67 R v Birks ((1990) 19 NSWLR 677 R v Markuleski (2001) 52 NSWLR 82; [2001] NSWCCA 290 R v Murray (1987) 11 NSWLR 12 RWC v R [2013] NSWCCA 58 Sita v R [2022] NSWCCA 90 The Queen v Dennis Bauer (a pseudonym) (2018) 266 CLR 56; [2018] HCA 40 Zhou v R [2021] NSWCCA 278 Texts Cited: Criminal Trial Courts Bench Book (Judicial Commission of NSW) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bruce Wayne Golding (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Quilter (Applicant) G Wright SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate