NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Hood-Carberry v R [2024] NSWDC 295 Hearing dates: 15 March 2024 Date of orders: 15 March 2024 Decision date: 15 March 2024 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Haesler SC DCJ Decision: Conviction appeal upheld – the convictions and all orders of the court below are set aside Catchwords: CRIME — Appeal and review — Appeal from Local Court to District Court — By person convicted against conviction CRIME — Violent offences — Resist/Hinder police officer in execution of duty — Assault police officer in the execution of duty CRIME — Police powers under LEPRA — Police powers under Bail Act Legislation Cited: Bail Act 2013 (NSW) Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bugmy v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2023] NSWSC 862 Bugmy v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2024] NSWCA 70 Charara v R (2006) 164 A Crim R 39 Dearman v Dearman (1908) 7 CLR 549 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v GW [2018] NSWSC 50 Director Public Prosecutions v Gribble [2004] NSWSC 926 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118 McNab v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2021] NSWCA 298 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jacob Hood-Carberry (the offender) Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Crown) Representation: Solicitors: H Dreher solicitor for Aboriginal Legal Service (NSW/ACT) A Edye solicitor for Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Crown) File Number(s): 2023/187608
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate