NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Butler [2024] NSWCCA 133 Hearing dates: 12 June 2024 Date of orders: 24 July 2024 Decision date: 24 July 2024 Before: Ward P at [1]; Campbell J at [2]; Button J at [69] Decision: In the exercise of the Court's residual discretion the Crown appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – Crown appeal against sentence – manifest inadequacy – offence of aiding and abetting an attempt by others to possess a commercial quantity of unlawfully imported border-controlled drugs – where the sentencing judge erred by treating the respondent's bail conditions as "quasi-custody" and backdated the sentence – respondent's impressive and substantial progress towards rehabilitation – Court's exercise of residual discretion not to interfere Legislation Cited: Bail Act 2013 (NSW), ss 7, 20, 20A, 22B Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), s 68A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 24, 47 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), ss 16A, 16E, 19AC, 20 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5D Criminal Code (Cth), 11.1, 11.2, 307.5 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 80 Cases Cited: AB v R [2014] NSWCCA 339 Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 Bui v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) (2012) 244 CLR 638; [2012] HCA 1 Clarke v R [2015] NSWCCA 232; 254 A Crim R 150 CMB v Attorney General for NSW (2015) 256 CLR 346; [2015] HCA 9 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1; [2010] NSWCCA 194 Frlanov v R [2018] NSWCCA 267 Green v The Queen; Quinn v the Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 Griffiths v The Queen (1977) 137 CLR 293; [1977] HCA 44 Hello v R [2010] NSWCCA 311 Hordern v R [2019] NSWCCA 138; 278 A Crim R 353 Hoskins v R [2016] NSWCCA 157 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Hunt v R [2021] NSWCCA 192 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 La v R [2021] NSWCCA 136 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259; [1996] HCA 6 Parente v R (2017) 96 NSWLR 633; [2017] NSWCCA 284 R v Anderson [2012] NSWCCA 175 R v Bredal [2024] NSWCCA 75 R v Butler [2024] NSWDC 79 R v JW (2010) 77 NSWLR 7; [2010] NSWCCA 49 R v Kassir [2020] NSWCCA 88 R v Nguyen; R v Pham [2010] NSWCCA 238; 205 A Crim R 106 R v O'Donoghue (1988) 34 A Crim R 397 R v Quinlin [2021] NSWCCA 284; 293 A Crim R 253 R v Reeves [2014] NSWCCA 154; 243 A Crim R 559 R v Webb [2004] NSWCCA 330; 149 A Crim R 167 Reeves v The Queen [2013] HCA 57; 88 ALJR 215 Waterways Authority v Fitzgibbon [2005] HCA 57; 79 ALJR 1816 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Rex (Crown) Kyle Lindsey Butler (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Callan SC with C Tran (Crown) G James KC with E James (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate