NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Unique Commercial Group Pty Ltd v Cusumano [2024] NSWCATAP 141 Hearing dates: 18 July 2024 Date of orders: 23 July 2024 Decision date: 23 July 2024 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: A Suthers, Principal Member Decision: (1) The application for summary dismissal of the appeal is refused. (2) The costs of the application are to be the Appellant's costs in the appeal. Catchwords: APPEALS — summary dismissal — questions of law available where no evidence led by Appellant at first instance Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW) Home Building Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: BDK v Department of Education and Communities [2015] NSWCATAP 129 Bellgrove v Eldridge (1954) 90 CLR 613 Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force v Hogan [2024] NSWCATAP 77 Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1; [1986] HCA 33 Crystele Designer Homes Pty Ltd v Wood [2023] NSWCATAP 242 Davis v NSW Minister for Health [2023] NSWCATAP 211 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (1964) 112 CLR 125 Henderson v Henderson [1843] EngR 917; (1843) 3 Hare 100 Hermes Nominees Pty Ltd v Shepherd [2024] NSWCATAP 36 Jain v Dr N Kalokerinos Pty Ltd [2023] NSWCATAP 141 McCann v Parsons (1954) 93 CLR 418; [1954] HCA 70 Medical Council of New South Wales v Lee [2017] NSWCA 282 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589; [1981] HCA 45 S & G Homes Pty Ltd t/as Pavilion Homes v Owen [2015] NSWCATAP 190 Samchris Pty Ltd v Keogh [2024] NSWCATAP 125 Schwartz Family Co Pty Ltd v Capitol Carpets Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCA 223 Simmons v New South Wales Trustee and Guardian [2014] NSWCA 405 Soulis v R & A Henry Auto Repairs Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCATAP 338 Spencer v Commonwealth (2010) 241 CLR 118 University of Wollongong v Metwally (1984) 158 CLR 447; [1984] HCA 74 Wollondilly Shire Council v Styles [2024] NSWCATAP 104 Zeitoune v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2024] NSWCATOD 59 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Unique Commercial Group Pty Ltd (Appellant) Richard Cusumano (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Martin (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate