NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Victorian X-Ray Group Pty Ltd v Malouf t/a Malouf Solicitors (No 3) [2024] NSWSC 888 Hearing dates: 27, 28, 29, 30 November, 1, 6 December 2023 and 9 April 2024 Date of orders: 23 July 2024 Decision date: 23 July 2024 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Cavanagh J Decision: (1) Judgment for the defendant. (2) The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs. (3) I grant liberty to apply on 3 days' notice should either party seek a variation of the costs order. Catchwords: NEGLIGENCE – solicitors – plaintiffs retained the defendant to advise and appear in respect of claims against them in the District Court – plaintiffs failed in all proceedings – whether the defendant should have advised that the defences were hopeless and doomed to fail prior to their filing –effect of "no oral variation" clauses in Australia OCCUPATIONS – legal practitioners – solicitors –advising client – obligation of solicitor to advise client that defence has no reasonable prospects of success – effect of Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (NSW) sch 2 NEGLIGENCE – damages – where plaintiffs' claim limited to costs paid for legal services and ordered costs in the District Court proceedings – where portion of these costs paid by companies unrelated to the proceedings but under the control of one of the plaintiffs – whether plaintiffs entitled to claim portion of costs paid by these "related entities" Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 5A, 5B, 5D Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (NSW), sch 2 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 51.9 Cases Cited: Astley v Austrust Ltd (1999) 197 CLR 1 Attwells v Jackson Lalic Lawyers Pty Ltd (2016) 259 CLR 1 Bailey v Bailey (1924) 34 CLR 558 Bird v Ford [2013] NSWSC 264 Bird v Ford [2014] NSWCA 242 Bundanoon Sandstone Pty Ltd v Cenric Group Pty Ltd [2019] NSWCA 87 Degiorgio v Dunn (No 2) (2005) 62 NSWLR 284 Fink v Fink (1946) 74 CLR 127 Flynn v PPK Mining Equipment Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 1640 Gokani v Visvalingam Pty Ltd [2023] NSWCA 80 Heydon v NRMA Ltd (2000) 51 NSWLR 1 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Lemoto v Able Technical Pty Ltd (2005) 63 NSWLR 300 MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd [2018] 2 WLR 1603 Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW v Dederer (2007) 234 CLR 330 Royal Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Victoria) v Holdsworth [2015] VSCA 243 Sara Stockham Pty Ltd v WLD Practice Holdings Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCA 51 Short v Delaney [1999] NSWSC 1293 Victorian X-Ray Group Pty Ltd v Malouf t/a Malouf Solicitors (No 2) [2024] NSWSC 887 White v Philips Electronics Australia t/as Philips Healthcare [2019] NSWCA 115 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Victorian X-Ray Group (Dandenong) Pty Ltd (First plaintiff) Victorian X-Ray Group (Boronia) Pty Ltd (Second plaintiff) Bevyn Thomas White (Third plaintiff) Anthony Malouf t/a Malouf Solicitors (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Luitingh (Plaintiffs) A Avery-Williams with P Boyle (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate