NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Le v Angius; Angius v Angius [2024] NSWSC 924 Hearing dates: 9–20 October 2023, 26 October 2023, 15–16 November 2023, 13–14 December 2023 02 February 2024 Date of orders: 01 August 2024 Decision date: 01 August 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity - Succession & Probate List - Family Provision Before: Richmond J Decision: See [434]-[437] Catchwords: SUCCESSION — Family provision — Claim by alleged de facto partner of the deceased for provision from the deceased's estate under Succession Act 2006 (NSW), Ch 3 — Whether eligible person — Whether in a de facto relationship at time of death SUCCESSION — Family provision — Claim by grandchild for provision from the deceased's estate under Succession Act 2006 (NSW), Ch 3 — Whether dependent at any time on the deceased — Whether factors warranting Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW) Succession Act 2006 (NSW) Property (Relationships) Act 1984 (NSW) Cases Cited: Angius v Salier [2019] NSWSC 184 Angius v Salier (No 5) [2023] NSWSC 678 Bowditch v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2012] NSWSC 275 Chapple v Wilcox (2014) 87 NSWLR 646; [2014] NSWCA 392 Chisak v Presot [2022] NSWCA 100 Dridi v Fillmore [2001] NSWSC 319 Estate of Laura Angius; Angius v Angius [2013] NSWSC 1895 Et-China.com International Holdings Ltd v Cheung (2021) 388 ALR 128; [2021] NSWCA 24 Fairbairn v Radecki (2022) 275 CLR 400; [2022] HCA 18 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; [2003] HCA 22 Gianna (Jenny) Angius v Gordon Albert Salier [2018] NSWSC 995 Gordon Salier v Robert Angius [2015] NSWSC 853 Hayes v Marquis [2008] NSWCA 10 Lalic v Lalic [2022] NSWSC 31 Lodin v Lodin [2017] NSWCA 327 McCarthy v Tye [2017] NSWCA 284 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Angkawijaya (2016) 236 FCR 303; [2016] FCAFC 5 NSW Trustee and Guardian v McGrath [2013] NSWSC 1894 Page v Page [2017] NSWCA 141 Petersen v Gregory; Estate Glen Alfred Petersen [2007] NSWSC 8 Piras v Egan [2008] NSWCA 59 Plunkett v Bull (1915) 19 CLR 544; [1915] HCA 14 Quijarro v Robson [2008] NSWSC 818 Re Fulop Deceased (1987) 8 NSWLR 679 Robert Angius v John Angius [2018] NSWSC 1772 Robson v Quijarro [2009] NSWCA 365 Saravinovski v Saravinovska [2017] NSWCA 85 Sheen v Hesan; the Estate of Zaheer [2023] NSWSC 468 Smoje v Forrester [2017] NSWCA 308 Spata v Tumino (2018) 95 NSWLR 706; [2018] NSWCA 17 Steinmetz v Shannon (2019) NSWLR 687; [2019] NSWCA 114 Sulliman v Sulliman [2002] NSWSC 169 Tarbes v Taleb [2023] NSWSC 565 Tobin v Ezekiel (2012) 83 NSWLR 757; [2012] NSWCA 285 Vaughan v Hoskovich [2010] NSWSC 706 Warner v Hung (No 2) (2011) 297 ALR 56; [2011] FCA 1123 Watson v Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 315 Zahra v Francica [2009] NSWSC 1206 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Proceedings 2022/41064 Thi Quy Le (Plaintiff) Jenny Angius (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate