NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Britten v Smith [2024] NSWLEC 1458 Hearing dates: 28 March 2024 Date of orders: 28 March 2024 Decision date: 28 March 2024 Jurisdiction: Class 2 Before: Douglas AC Decision: The Court orders: (1) The application is refused. Catchwords: TREES (DISPUTES BETWEEN NEIGHBOURS) – high hedges – Review of the Trees Act – trees severely obstructing sunlight before applicants' occupation – other causes of sunlight obstruction Legislation Cited: Interpretation Act 1987 Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006, Pt 2A, ss 14A, 14B, 14E, 14F Trees (Disputes between Neighbours) Regulation 2019, s 4 Cases Cited: Barker v Kyriakides [2007] NSWLEC 292 Byrne v Davies [2024] NSWLEC 1295 Grantham Holdings Pty Ltd v Miller [2011] NSWLEC 1122 Lee v Stapleton [2022] NSWLEC 1430 Texts Cited: NSW Justice & Attorney General's Department 'Review of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (NSW)' (November 2009) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jonathan Britten (First Applicant) Zoye Britten (Second Applicant) Don Smith (First Respondent) Wendy Smith (Second Respondent) Max Osbourne (Third Respondent) Representation: J Britten (Self represented) (First Applicant) Z Britten (Self represented) (Second Applicant) D Smith (Self represented) (First Respondent) W Smith (Self represented) (Second Respondent) M Osbourne (Self represented) (Third Respondent) File Number(s): 2024/35110 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate