NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Mallegowda v The Transport Secretary [2024] NSWCATEN 2 Hearing dates: 26 April 2024 Date of orders: 31 July 2024 Decision date: 31 July 2024 Jurisdiction: Enforcement Before: Coleman SC ADCJ, Principal Member Decision: That the application filed on 2 April 2024 is dismissed. Catchwords: CONTEMPT — referral to Supreme Court pursuant to s 73(5) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 — whether Respondent's conduct had a tendency to intimidate or threaten Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Legal Profession Uniform Law Australian Solicitors' Conduct Rules 2015 (NSW) Cases Cited: Attorney-General v Times Newspapers Ltd (1974) AC 273 Bhagat v Global Custodians Ltd [2002] NSWCA 160 DVI v ZTT [2021] NSWCATEN 4 Harkianakis v Skalkos (1997) 42 NSWLR 22 Lane v Registrar of Supreme Court of New South Wales (1981) 148 CLR 245; [1981] HCA 35 Novotny v Cropley [2005] NSWCA 26 Nuclear Utility Technology and Environmental Corp Inc (Nu-Tec) v Australian Broadcasting Commission (ABC) [2009] NSWSC 78 Wiltshire Smith v Votino Bros Pty Limited (1993) 41 FCR 496 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Shashikanth Mallegowda (Applicant) The Transport Secretary (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Applicant (self-represented) Spark Helmore (Respondent) File Number(s): 2024/00124693 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate