NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Munich Reinsurance Company of Australasia Limited v AMP Limited [2024] NSWSC 950 Hearing dates: 26 July 2024 Decision date: 05 August 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Ball J Decision: (1) Paragraphs 69-81 and 84-86 of the cross-claimant's amended statement of cross-claim filed on 22 April 2024 be struck out, together with prayer 2 of the relief claimed to the extent it seeks damages under s 55 of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth); (2) The cross-claimant to pay the cross-defendants' costs of the cross-defendants' notice of motion filed on 5 July 2024; (3) Leave be granted to the plaintiff to file a further amended statement of claim in substantially the form of Annexure A to the plaintiff's notice of motion filed on 5 July 2024 excluding Part 14 of that annexure; (4) The plaintiff to pay the defendants' costs thrown away by reason of the amendments; (5) The plaintiff to pay the first, third, fourth, fifth and sixth defendants' costs of the plaintiff's notice of motion filed on 5 July 2024. (6) Stand the matter over for directions to 9 August 2024. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Pleadings — Amendment — Where applicant seeks to add claim under Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth) — Section 55(3) — Whether causal connection exists between loss claimed by the applicant and alleged breach CIVIL PROCEDURE — Pleadings — Striking out — Tendency to cause prejudice, embarrassment or delay Legislation Cited: Australian Consumer Law Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Agar v Hyde (2000) 201 CLR 552; [2000] HCA 41 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner of Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125; [1964] HCA 69 Janssen-Cilag Pty Ltd v Pfizer Pty Ltd (1992) 37 FCR 526; (1992) 109 ALR 638 Mills v Walsh [2022] NSWCA 255 Shaw v New South Wales [2012] NSWCA 102 SZTAL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2017) 262 CLR 362; [2017] HCA 34 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Munich Reinsurance Company of Australasia Limited (Plaintiff) AMP Limited (First Defendant) Resolution Life Australasia Limited (Second Defendant | First Cross Claimant) AMP Services Limited (Third Defendant | First Cross Defendant) AWM Services Pty Ltd (Fourth Defendant) AMP Superannuation Limited (Fifth Defendant) N.M. Superannuation Proprietary Limited (Sixth Defendant | Second Cross Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Williams SC with J Pokoney (Plaintiff) AE Munro with K Sharma (First, Third to Sixth Defendants | First and Second Cross Defendants) T Marskell with E Doyle-Markwick (Second Defendant | First Cross Claimant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate