NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Blue Mirror Pty Ltd v Tan & Tan Australia Pty Ltd (in liq) [2024] NSWCA 193 Hearing dates: 5 August 2024 Date of orders: 6 August 2024 Decision date: 06 August 2024 Before: Payne JA Decision: (1) Notice of Motion dated 26 July 2024 is dismissed. (2) Applicants on the motion pay the respondent's costs of the motion. Catchwords: COSTS – Security for costs – delay in making application for security – appeal date vacated if order for security made - motion dismissed Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 67 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 1335 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 51.50 Cases Cited: Blue Mirror Pty Ltd v Pegasus Australia Developments Pty Ltd (in liquidation) [2024] NSWSC 28 Boensch v Transport for NSW [2024] NSWCA 86 Broadway Plaza Investments Pty Ltd v Broadway Plaza Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 1082 LSKF Holdings Pty Ltd v Shield Lifestone Holdings Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 109 McMillan v Coolah Home Base Pty Ltd [2023] NSWCA 172 Mohareb v Harbour Radio Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 231 Mualim v Dzelme [2020] NSWCA 333 Palermo Seafoods Pty Ltd v Lunapas Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 149 Pioneer Park Pty Ltd (In liq) v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2007] NSWCA 344 Preston v Harbour Pacific Underwriting Management Pty Ltd [2007] NSWCA 247 Reddy v C&P Syndicate Pty Ltd [2013] NSWCA 425 Rickard Constructions Pty Ltd v Rickard Hails Moretti Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 283 SSABR Pty Ltd v AMA Group Ltd [2024] NSWCA 104 Swift v McLeary [2013] NSWCA 173 Tyneside Property Management Pty Ltd v Hammersmith Management Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 417 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Tan & Tan Australia Pty Ltd (in liq) (first respondent/did not participate on the motion) Anthony Tan (second respondent/first applicant on the motion) Australian Construction Company Pty Ltd (third respondent/second applicant on the motion) Blue Mirror Pty Ltd (appellant/respondent on the motion) Representation: Counsel: S Burchett (applicants on the motion) A Cheshire SC (respondents on the motion)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate