NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Abdalla v Rasier Pacific Pty Ltd [2024] NSWCATCD 7 Hearing dates: 18 January 2024 Date of orders: 28 June 2024 Decision date: 28 June 2024 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: D Robertson, Senior Member Decision: (1) The Respondents Rasier Pacific Pty Ltd and Uber BV are to pay the Applicant, Salahadeen Suliman Hussaen Abdalla, damages for breach of contract in the sum of $1000, immediately. (2) The application is otherwise dismissed. Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – Breach of contract – Deactivation of Uber driver's access to the Uber App – Whether deactivation authorised by contract between Uber entities and driver CONSUMER LAW – Unfair contract terms – Small business contract – Whether agreement between Uber entities and driver was a small business contract – Whether term permitting Uber entities to terminate the contract or deactivate access to the Uber App without notice or cause would be an unfair contract term – Whether term limiting the damages recoverable for breach of the contract by the Uber entities was an unfair contract term Legislation Cited: Australian Consumer Law (NSW) ss 23, 24, 25 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) Cases Cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Chrisco Hampers Australia Ltd (2015) 239 FCR 33; [2015] FCA 1204 Bell Solar Pty Limited T/as Sunboost v Anderson [2021] NSWCATAP 278 Cessnock City Council v 123 259 932 Pty Ltd [2024] HCA 17 Commercial Union Assurance Co of Australia Ltd v Ferrcom Pty Ltd (1991) 22 NSWLR 389 Maygood Australia Pty Ltd v The Owners – Strata Plan No 85338 [2020] NSWCATAP 237 Najafi v Rasier Pacific Pty Ltd [2023] NSWCATCD 153 Rehman v Rasier Pacific Pty Ltd [2024] NSWCATCD 3 Robinson v Harman (1848) 1 Exch 850; 154 ER 363 Singh v Rasier Pacific Pty Ltd [2024] NSWCATCD 4 Texts Cited: Halsbury's Laws of Australia [110 – 11365] Category: Principal judgment Parties: Salahaldeen Suliman Hussaen Abdalla (Applicant) Rasier Pacific Pty Ltd (First Respondent) Uber BV (Second Respondent) Representation: Applicant in person C Murray-Baptista, solicitor (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate