NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Peter Holmes Investments Pty Ltd v S&C Nicola Pty Ltd (No 3) [2024] NSWSC 965 Hearing dates: On the papers; final submissions ending 20 April 2024 Date of orders: 7 August 2024 Decision date: 07 August 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Parker J Decision: See [110] Catchwords: COSTS — party/party — parties involved in property investment and development ventures — dispute about financing of several development ventures — majority of claims settled out of Court — partnership account ordered — all substantiative claims for relief determined — apportionment of costs to reflect mixed success of parties on claim and cross-claims — costs to lie where they fall in relation to settled claims — Re Minister for Immigration; Ex parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622 — general rule that costs follow the event to be applied distributively by reference to separate "events" Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Akierman Holdings Pty Limited v Akerman (No 3); In the matter of Akierman Holdings Pty Limited (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 869 Medway Oil & Storage Co Ltd v Continental Contractors Ltd [1929] AC 88 Morgan Equipment Company v Rodgers (No 2) (1993) 32 NSWLR 467 Peter Holmes Investments Pty Ltd v S&C Nicola Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 1174 Peter Holmes Investments Pty Ltd v S&C Nicola Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 1215 Re Minister for Immigration; Ex parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622 S&C Nicola Pty Ltd v Peter Holmes Investments Pty Ltd [2022] NSWCA 72 Shazbot Pty Ltd v Warner Capital Pty Ltd (No 6) [2024] NSWSC 81 Smith v Madden (1946) 73 CLR 129 Southern Oil Refining Pty Ltd v Hydrodec Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 336 Trentelman v The Owners - Strata Plan 76700 (No 3); The Owners - Strata Plan 76700 v Trentelman (No 3) [2021] NSWSC 578 Woods v Sheriff of Queensland (1895) 6 QLJ 163 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Costs Parties: Statement of Claim Peter Holmes Investments Pty Limited (Plaintiff) S&C Nicola Pty Limited (First Defendant) Manotik Pty Limited (Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate