NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: The Owners – Strata Plan No. 82089 v Omaya Holding Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 992 Hearing dates: 18 July 2024 Date of orders: 09 August 2024 Decision date: 09 August 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity - Technology and Construction List Before: McGrath J Decision: (1) Amendment of pleadings made of court's own motion to correct an obvious error. (2) Strike-out application upheld for identified paragraphs with leave to the plaintiff to replead. (3) Application for summary dismissal and balance of notice of motion dismissed. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — application for summary dismissal or strike out of pleadings — leave sought to withdraw alleged admissions in list response — where alleged admissions arise in part from obvious error in list response — court's power to make amendment to facilitate just, quick and cheap resolution of real issues in dispute — finding that alleged admissions not truly admissions — General Steel test not met — no summary dismissal — finding that part of pleadings embarrassing and liable to be struck out Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2000 (NSW) s 34(2) Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss 56(1), 56(2), 57, 58, 64 Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020 (NSW) s 37(1) Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) ss 3A, 18B, 18D Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 12.6, 13.4, 14.28 Cases Cited: Agar v Hyde (2000) 201 CLR 552; [2000] HCA 41 Agius v New South Wales [2001] NSWCA 371 Agusta Pty Limited v Provident Capital Limited (2012) 16 BPR 30,397; [2012] NSWSCA 26 Aon Risk Services Australia Limited v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175; [2009] HCA 27 Banque Commerciale SA (in liq) v Akhil Holdings Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 279; [1990] HCA 11 Batistatos v Roads & Traffic Authority New South Wales (2006) 226 CLR 256; [2006] HCA 27 CGU Insurance Ltd v Blakeley (2016) 259 CLR 339; [2016] HCA 2 Dickens v New South Wales (No 3) [2018] NSWSC 485 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (1964) 112 CLR 125; [1964] HCA 69 Gould v Mount Oxide Mines Ltd (1916) 22 CLR 490; [1916] HCA 81 GR v Secretary, Department of Communities and Justice [2023] NSWCA 239 Grygiel v Baine [2005] NSWCA 218 Jaken Properties Australia Pty Ltd v Naaman (2023) 12 NSWLR 318; [2023] NSWCA 214 McGuirk v The University of New South Wales [2009] NSWSC 1424 Naaman v Jaken Properties Australia Pty Ltd [2024] HCASL 21 NM Rural Enterprises Pty Ltd v Rimanui Farms Limited [2010] NSWSC 969 Penthouse Publications Ltd v McWilliam (Court of Appeal (NSW), Priestley and Meagher JJA and Wardell AJA, 15 March 1991, unrep) Shaw v State of New South Wales (2012) 219 IR 87; [2012] NSWCA 102 Simmons v New South Wales Trustee and Guardian (2014) 17 BPR 33,717; [2014] NSWCA 405 Spencer v Commonwealth (2010) 241 CLR 118; [2010] HCA 28 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: The Owners – Strata Plan No. 82089 (Plaintiff) Omaya Holding Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Arinson Pty Ltd (Second Defendant/First Cross-Claimant) Omaya Investments Pty Ltd (Third Defendant/ Second Cross-Claimant) BSM Holdings Pty Ltd (Sixth Defendant) Integrated Design Group Pty Ltd (First Cross-Defendant) Bernie Cohen & Associates Pty Ltd trading as Essential Certifiers (Second Cross-Defendant) Representation: Counsel: C Mobellan (Plaintiff) F Corsaro SC (Defendants/Cross-Claimants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate