NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Brougham [2024] NSWDC 329 Hearing dates: 4 June 2024 Date of orders: 14 June 2024 Decision date: 14 June 2024 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Tupman DCJ Decision: 1. Offender is convicted. 2. For sequence 2, offender sentenced to a fixed term of imprisonment of 18 months. 3. Sequence 4 taken into account on a Form 1. 4. For sequence 8, offender sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 4 years and 6 months, with NPP of 2 years and 6 months. 5. Sequences 5 and 6 taken into account on a Form 1. Catchwords: EAGP SCHEME – misnomer – 11 months before pleas of guilty entered – nine mentions – unnecessary and long adjournments – chronology not unusual – frequent experience of this Court – offenders and victims not well served by EAGPS – meant to elicit early pleas for utilitarian benefit to administration of justice – review required CRIME – sentence – (a) intentionally touch child aged between 10 and 16 – s66DB(a) Crimes Act 1900 – maximum penalty 10 years imprisonment – additional offence on Form 1 – (b) sexual intercourse with child aged between 10 and 14 – s66C(1) Crimes Act 1900 – maximum penalty 16 years imprisonment – standard NPP 7 years – two additional offences on Form 1 OFFENCE – sexual intercourse – fellatio – Form 1 – sexual touching in victim's bedroom – sexual touching following day in pool in front of others – offender aged 32 – victim aged 11 – offender in relationship with victim's older brother – offender lived in victim's household OBJECTIVE SERIOUSNESS – middle range – big age gap – bottom of relevant age range for child victim – not one-off offences – offence committed in victim's home – victim entitled to feel safe – offences in pool and spa planned – no additional violence – committed in the open – degree of persistence SUBJECTIVE CASE – Indigenous Australian man – witnessed domestic violence – hid sexuality – victim of childhood sexual abuse – poor educational history – long term unemployed – recognised sexual interest in children – sought psychological counselling – admitted difficulties controlling behaviour – anti-social – borderline personality traits – history of suicidal ideation – cognitive distortions supporting sexual offending – risk of reoffending well above average – guarded prospects of rehabilitation – prior convictions in Queensland for similar offences SENTENCE – general and specific deterrence – denunciation – punishment – rehabilitation – 25% discount – utilitarian value of guilty plea – partial accumulation – close supervision in community – demonstrated remorse and contrition – special circumstances Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW): ss 66C(1), 66DB(a) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW): s 32 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Category: Sentence Parties: Rex (Crown) Aaron Brougham (Offender) Representation: Counsel: C Feiner (Offender)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate