NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Herbert v Lee; Lee v Hemphill [2023] NSWCATCD 177 Hearing dates: 03 October 2023 Date of orders: 17 October 2023 Decision date: 17 October 2023 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: G Blake AM SC, Senior Member Decision: 1. The respondents in proceedings COM 23/24375 are to repay $11,325.61 to the applicants immediately. 2. Proceedings COM 23/30593 are dismissed. Catchwords: LEASES AND TENANCIES — Retail leases — Misleading or deceptive conduct LEASES AND TENANCIES — Retail leases — Repairs — Lessor's duty – whether the duty extends to part of the common property - whether the lessee is not liable to pay rent where complaint about the condition of the common property Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), ss 28, 29, 36, Sch 4, cl 3 Conveyancing (Strata Titles) Act 1961 (NSW) Retail Leases Act 1994 (NSW), ss 7, 36, 62D, 63, 70, 71, 72 Retail Leases Regulation 2022 (NSW), Sch 1, cl 4 Strata Schemes (Freehold Development) Act 1973 (NSW), Sch 4, cl 3 Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW), s 142 Cases Cited: Cominos v Di Rico [2016] NSWCATAP 5 Larsen v The Owners - Strata Plan No. 3573 [2022] NSWCATCD 43 Lekhwar v Singh [2022] NSWCATCD 108 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: COM 23/24375: Cara Stella Bianchetto Herbert and Lachlan Heathcote Hemphill (Applicants) Yuen Ha Lee and Ronan Delaney (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate