NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Chalik v Chalik [2024] NSWSC 995 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 9 August 2024 Decision date: 09 August 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: Order made varying the orders for costs in the principal judgment. Plaintiff ordered to pay the defendant's costs of the proceedings, but a gross sum fixed instead of assessed costs and limited in the amount of $40,000. Catchwords: COSTS – Party/Party — Payable out of a fund — Deceased estate – Calderbank letters – gross sum costs order – testator dies leaving two sons, the plaintiff and the defendant – principal judgment in the probate proceedings dismisses the plaintiff's claim to have admitted to probate the testator's later will, giving the whole of her estate to the plaintiff – the court admits to probate the earlier will dividing the estate between the plaintiff and the defendant – separate Calderbank and UCPR r 20.26 letters issued by the defendant – the principal judgment orders that the parties bear their own costs – defendant applies to vary costs orders on the basis the plaintiff had failed on all issues – whether the Calderbank letter offer effective – whether the UCPR r 20.26 offer of compromise effective – whether the Court should make a gross sum costs order or otherwise limit the costs payable to give effect to the Calderbank letter or the offer of compromise. CIVIL PROCEDURE — expert evidence – comments in relation to the need for prompt payment of court-appointed experts – consideration of how a party who has not paid a court expert should be required to pay that expert – consideration of how compensation for the expert should be measured. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, ss 98(1), (4)(c), 100 Succession Act 2006, s 59 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules, r 20.26 Cases Cited: Arnott v Choy (No. 2) [2010] NSWCA 285 Bassett v Bassett [2021] NSWCA 320 Chalik v Chalik [2023] NSWSC 117 Chaina v Alvaro Homes Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 353 Coss v Norman (No 2) NSWSC 1490 Evans of Robb Evans & Associates v European Bank Ltd (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 170 Evans Shire Council v Richardson (No 2) [2006] NSWCA 61 Hancock v Arnold; Dodd v Arnold (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 19 Hazeldene's Chicken Farm Pty Ltd v Victorian WorkCover Authority (No. 2) (2005) 13 VR 435; [2005] VSCA 298 King Network Group Pty Ltd v Club of the Clubs Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2009] NSWSC 8204 Miwa Pty Ltd v Siantan Properties Pte Ltd (No. 2) [2011] NSWCA 344 Singer v Berghouse (1994) 181 CLR 201; [1994] HCA 40 The Anderson Group Pty Ltd v Tynan Motors Pty Ltd (No 2) [2006] 67 NSWLR 706; [2006] NSWCA 120 Walker v Harwood [2017] NSWCA 228 Category: Costs Parties: Igor Chalik (Applicant) Gregory Roman Chalik (First Respondent) Monika Ross-Maranik (Second Respondent) Christopher Adamson (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr N Allan (Applicant) Mr G Chalik (First Respondent: Self-Represented)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate