NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Mallegowda v Hawkesbury City Council [2024] NSWIRComm 1048 Hearing dates: 2 August 2024 Date of orders: 9 August 2024 Decision date: 09 August 2024 Jurisdiction: Industrial Relations Commission Before: Commissioner McDonald Decision: Proceedings 2024/96185 and 2024/112612 are permanently stayed Catchwords: EMPLOYMENT AND INDUSTRIAL LAW — Victimisation and Unfair dismissal claims — Whether parties entered into a binding agreement to settle the claims – Where offer made by Respondent "subject to Deed of Release" ostensibly accepted by Applicant – Where Applicant contended that parties' intention was not to make a concluded bargain unless and until a deed was signed — Evidence established parties intended to be bound before signing deed, however signing of deed was condition of performance EVIDENCE — Privileges — Evidence of settlement negotiations admissible in proceeding in which the making of a settlement agreement is in issue JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS — Appropriate order to be made pursuant to s 73(1)(b) of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) in circumstances where signing deed is a condition of performance – proceedings permanently stayed Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 4, 67, 73 and Sch 1 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 131 Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW), Part 6, ss 163(1)(b),174, 213 Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v XIVth Commonwealth Games Ltd (1988) 18 NSWLR 540 Baulkham Hills Private Hospital Pty Ltd v GR Securities Pty Ltd (1986) 40 NSWLR 622 Dr Payne v The University of Sydney & Anor [2000] NSWIRComm 102 Falconer v Fire and Rescue NSW [2020] NSWIRComm 1053 Geebung Investments Pty Ltd v Varga Group Investments (No 8) Pty Ltd (1995) 7 BPR 14,551 Jones v Jones [2024] NSWSC 210 Liszt v Health Secretary in respect of Sydney Local Health District (No 2) [2020] NSWIRComm 1078 Liszt v Health Secretary in respect of Sydney Local Health District [2020] NSWIRComm 1030; 295 IR 285 Masters v Cameron [1954] HCA 72; (1954) 91 CLR 353 Pavlovic v Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 313 Secretary of the Ministry of Health v New South Wales Nurses and Midwives' Association [2022] NSWSC 1178; 320 IR 249 Stokes v Toyne [2023] NSWCA 59 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Shashikanth Mallegowda (Applicant) Hawkesbury City Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Nagle (Respondent) Solicitors: Thomas Duffy, Local Government NSW (Respondent) File Number(s): 2024/96185 and 2024/112612 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate