NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Wiesner v McCormack [2024] NSWLEC 1500 Hearing dates: 02 July 2024 Date of orders: 02 July 2024 Decision date: 02 July 2024 Jurisdiction: Class 2 Before: Douglas AC Decision: The Court orders that: (1) The application is refused. Catchwords: TREES (DISPUTES BETWEEN NEIGHBOURS): high hedges – obstruction of views is not severe – respondents' privacy important Legislation Cited: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006, ss 14A, 14B, 14C, 14D, 14E, 14F State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008 Cases Cited: Grantham Holdings Pty Ltd v Miller [2011] NSWLEC 1122 Haindl v Daisch [2011] NSWLEC 1145 McDougall v Philip [2011] NSWLEC 1280 Porteous v Mares [2022] NSWLEC 1544 Robson v Leischke (2008) 72 NSWLR 98; [2008] NSWLEC 152 Tenacity Consulting v Warringah (2004) 134 LGERA 23; [2004] NSWLEC 140 Tooth v McCombie [2011] NSWLEC 1004 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Christopher Paul Wiesner (First Applicant) Sania Rose Gugich (Second Applicant) Paul John McCormack (First Respondent) Tierre Maree McCormack (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Lee (Solicitor) (Applicants) P McCormack (Self-represented) (First Respondent) T McCormack (Self-represented) (Second Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate