NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Eco-Pact Pty Ltd v The Law Society of NSW [2024] NSWCA 206 Hearing dates: 26 July 2024 Date of orders: 19 August 2024 Decision date: 19 August 2024 Before: Ward P at [1]; Leeming JA at [147]; Price AJA at [148] Decision: 1. Extend the time for the filing of the applicant's notice of motion to 17 May 2024. 2. Dismiss the applicant's notice of motion with costs. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Security for costs – Application for review of decision of Adamson JA – Review of decision of Registrar ordering security for costs of appeal – Consideration of public importance – Prospects of appeal – Issue of stultification – Obligations as model litigant Legislation Cited: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), s 266 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 60 Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 37A Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 590, 596 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 75 Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW), s 261 Legal Profession Regulation 2005 (NSW), cl 88 Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW), ss 6, 129, 240, 244, 247 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 46 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 42.21, 51.58 Cases Cited: Allison v Murphy [2021] FCA 1551 Bell Wholesale Co Ltd v Gates Export Corporation (1984) 2 FCR 1 Bingham v Bevan [2023] NSWSC 998 Brown v King [2022] NSWCA 75 Collier v Lancer [2013] NSWCA 185 Colquhoun v District Court of New South Wales (No 2) [2015] NSWCA 54 Eco-Pact Pty Ltd v Law Society of New South Wales [2023] NSWCA 257 Eco-Pact Pty Ltd v Law Society of New South Wales [2023] NSWSC 283 Fard v Secretary, Department of Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1224 Flip Out Thornton Pty Ltd v Flip Out-Trampoline Arena Franchises Pty Ltd [2023] NSWSC 1094 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Live Board Holdings Ltd v Cody Live Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCA 302 Madgwick v Kelly (2013) 212 FCR 1; [2013] FCAFC 61 Mastrangelo v Reynolds (2001) 25 WAR 133; [2001] WASCA 347 Picos v The Council of the New South Wales Bar Association [2023] NSWCA 218 Rinehart v Welker (2011) 93 NSWLR 311; [2011] NSWCA 403 Smail v Burton [1975] VR 776 Tomko v Palasky (No 2) (2007) 71 NSWLR 61; [2007] NSWCA 369 Wang v Law Society NSW (2009) 73 NSWLR 226; [2009] NSWSC 67 Wang v Law Society NSW (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 1720 Wentworth v Wentworth (1994) 35 NSWLR 726 Zakka v George Elias t/a Cadmus Lawyers [2012] NSWCA 277 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Eco-Pact Pty Ltd (Appellant) The Law Society of New South Wales (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Barham (Appellant) T Prince and H Rogers (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate