NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Jackson [2024] NSWCCA 156 Hearing dates: 14 June 2024 Date of orders: 21 August 2024 Decision date: 21 August 2024 Before: Kirk JA at [1] Campbell J at [2] McNaughton J at [3] Decision: (1) Allow the appeal. (2) Quash the sentence imposed on the respondent in the District Court on 22 February 2024, and in lieu thereof, sentence the respondent to a term of imprisonment of 6 years with a non-parole period of 4 years, commencing on 16 November 2023. The date the respondent is first eligible for release to parole is 15 November 2027. Catchwords: CRIME – sentencing – appeal by Crown against sentence – sexual intercourse without consent – where offending occurred in circumstances of geographical isolation – where age and power differential between victim and respondent – whether sentence manifestly inadequate – whether residual discretion should not be exercised – appeal allowed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61I, 61J Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 3A, 21A, 44 Cases Cited: AA v R [2024] NSWCCA 132 Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 Cahyadi v R [2007] NSWCCA 1; (2007) 168 A Crim R 41 CMB v Attorney General for the State of New South Wales (2015) 256 CLR 346; [2015] HCA 9 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 Dionnet v R [2009] NSWCCA 85 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Kelly v R [2022] NSWCCA 189 Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120; [2011] HCA 39 R v Gavel [2014] NSWCCA 56; (2014) 239 A Crim R 469 R v Hernando [2002] NSWCCA 489; (2002) 136 A Crim R 451 R v O'Connor [2014] NSWCCA 53; (2014) 239 A Crime R 487 R v Shortland [2018] NSWCCA 34 R v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 704; [2001] NSWCCA 534 R v Songcuan (No 3) [2023] NSWSC 183 Stein v R [2023] NSWCCA 324 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Rex (Appellant) Glen William Jackson (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G Newton SC (Appellant) J Lo Schiavo (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate