NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Adams v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2024] NSWCATAD 243 Hearing dates: 20 March 2024 Date of orders: 20 August 2024 Decision date: 20 August 2024 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: K Mobbs, Senior Member Decision: (1) The decision under review is affirmed. (2) Pursuant to s 64(1)(c) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, the publication of the confidential material or matters contained in this material is prohibited. (3) Pursuant to s 64(1)(d) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, the disclosure of the confidential material or matters contained in this material is restricted to the Respondent and the Tribunal. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Access to information — GIPA –whether there is an overriding public interest consideration against disclosure – balancing the public interest Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW) Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (NSW) Cases Cited: Attorney-General's Department v Cockcroft (1986) 10 FCR 180 Australians for Sustainable Development Inc v Barangaroo Delivery Authority [2013] NSWADT 252 Beregi v Department of Planning Industry and Environment [2020] NSWCATAP 185 Bright v Eurobodalla Shire Council [2018] NSWCATAD 287 Collins v Department of Finance, Services and Innovation [2018] NSWCATAD 60 Commissioner of Police v Barrett [2015] NSWCATAP 68 Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force v Camilleri (GD) [2012] NSWADTAP 19 DDL v Mid-Western Regional Council [2018] NSWCATAD 2 Donnellan v Ku-ring-gai Council [2013] NSWADT 115 EHW v Secretary, Department of Education [2022] NSWCATAD 140 Flack v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2011] NSWADT 286 Hurst v Wagga Wagga City Council [2011] NSWADT 307 at [60] Leech v Sydney Water Corporation [2010] NSWADT 298 Macquarie University v Howell (No 2) [2009] NSWADTAP 19 Newcastle City Council v Newcastle East Residents Action Group [2018] NSWCATAP 254 Raven v University of Sydney [2015] NSWCATAD 104 Simring v Commissioner of Police (NSW) [2009] NSWSC 270 South Dural Residents and Ratepayers Group Inc. v Roads and Maritime Services [2019] NSWCATAD 83 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Charlie Armstrong Adams (Applicant) Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (Respondent) Representation: Applicant (Self-Represented) McCullough Robertson Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2023/00360266 Publication restriction: (1) Pursuant to s 64(1)(c) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, the publication of the confidential material or matters contained in this material is prohibited. (2) Pursuant to s 64(1)(d) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, the disclosure of the confidential material or matters contained in this material is restricted to the Respondent and the Tribunal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate