NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Gauci v Roo [2024] NSWDC 361 Hearing dates: 9 August 2024 Date of orders: 21 August 2024 Decision date: 21 August 2024 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Catsanos SC DCJ Decision: (1) Dismiss the defendant's notice of motion filed on 17 January 2024. (2) The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs on the notice of motion. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – Interlocutory application – Medical examination – Pt 23 r 23.4 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) – Motor vehicle accident – Defendant seeking order for plaintiff to submit to CT scan - Whether request is reasonable in the circumstances – motion dismissed Legislation Cited: Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Aspinall v Sterling Mansell Ltd [1981] All ER 866 Corke v Shopping Centres Australasia Property Group Limited trading as Cabarita Beach Shopping Centre [2024] NSWSC 1019 Dikschei v Epworth Foundation & Anor [2010] VSC 435 Plaintiff [name withheld] v Stapleton [2017] NSWSC 914 Rowlands v State of New South Wales [2009] NSWCA 136; (2009) 74 NSWLR 715 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Andre Gauci (plaintiff/respondent)
Eun Jung Roo (defendant/applicant) Representation: Counsel: E Welsh and W Lidden (plaintiff/respondent) M Nesbeth (defendant/applicant)
Solicitors: Boyd House & Partners (plaintiff/respondent) Sparke Helmore Lawyers (defendant/applicant) File Number(s): 2021/00129791
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate