NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Daynes v I-MED Central Queensland Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 1064 Hearing dates: 8, 9, 10, 11 July 2024 Date of orders: 22 August 2024 Decision date: 22 August 2024 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Cavanagh J Decision: (1) Judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $367,952.56. (2) Defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs. (3) Should either party seek a variation of those cost orders I grant liberty to apply on three days' notice. Catchwords: EMPLOYMENT LAW – contract – summary dismissal – whether the plaintiff engaged in misconduct of sufficient seriousness to justify summary dismissal – allegations of sexual harassment and bullying – whether allegation of sexual harassment proved – whether the plaintiff's conduct amounted to bullying – relevance of the defendant's workplace policies CONTRACT – contract of employment – contractual power to terminate without notice where employee engaged in "serious misconduct" – whether employer obliged to act reasonably in forming the view that employee had engaged in such misconduct DAMAGES – contract of employment – wrongful dismissal – whether absent the wrongful termination the plaintiff would have continued working for the defendant for the period alleged – whether the defendant would have exercised its power to terminate on notice at the end of the fixed term period Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 100 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 140 Cases Cited: Bartlett v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2016) 92 NSWLR 639 Blyth Chemicals Ltd v Bushnell (1933) 49 CLR 66 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Clouston & Co Ltd v Corry [1906] AC 122 Darling Island Stevedoring & Lighterage Co Ltd v Jacobsen (1945) 70 CLR 635 Eldridge v Wagga Wagga City Council [2021] NSWSC 312 Guthrie v News Ltd (2010) 27 VR 196 Harden v Willis Australia Group Services Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 939 Hadley v Baxendale (1854) 9 Ex 341 Johnson v Perez (1988) 166 CLR 351 New South Wales Cancer Council v Sarfaty (1992) 28 NSWLR 68 Martinez as trustee for Martinez HWL Practice Trust as representative of the partners trading as HWL Ebsworth Lawyers v Griffiths as trustee for the Griffiths HWL Practice Trust [2019] NSWCA 310 North v Television Corporation (1976) 11 ALR 599 Pastrycooks Employees, Biscuit Makers Employees and Flour and Sugar Goods Workers Union (NSW) v Gartrell White (No 3) (1990) 35 IR 70 Roderick v Washington H Soul Pattinson & Company Ltd (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 1224 Service Station Association Ltd v Berg Bennett & Associates Pty Ltd (1993) 117 ALR 393 Silverbook Research Pty Ltd v Lindley [2010] NSWCA 357 United Group Rail Services Ltd v Rail Corporation of New South Wales (2009) 74 NSWLR 618 Willis Australia Group Services Pty Ltd v Mitchell-Innes [2015] NSWCA 381 Texts Cited: Riley, O'Grady and Sappideen, Macken's Law of Employment, (Thomson Reuters, 9th ed, 2022) Supreme Court Practice Note 16 (16 June 2010) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Anthony Kevin Daynes (Plaintiff) I-MED Central Queensland Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: A Moses SC with J Bennett (Plaintiff) L Saunders (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate