NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Diallo & Ors (No 10); Re referral of witness KL for contempt [2024] NSWSC 1085 Hearing dates: 8 July 2024 and 19 August 2024 Date of orders: 18 September 2024 Decision date: 18 September 2024 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hamill J Decision: (1) KL and his solicitors to be advised that I am inclined to refer the matter to the Prothonotary to institute proceedings for contempt. (2) KL is directed to appear before the Court at 2:30pm on 19 September 2024 to provide submissions as to why the matter should not be so referred. (3) KL is to appear by audio visual link and I direct the Registrar to make the appropriate arrangements for that to occur. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – contempt in the face of the court – where witness refuses to answer questions when directed to do so – alternative procedures for dealing with contempt – unusual circumstances – witness charged with unrelated murder – where witness seeking to traverse a plea of guilty based on trauma response to watching death of victim of current killing – where witness directed to answer questions with the protection of a certificate under s 128 of Evidence Act – preferable not to deal with contempt by summary procedure – preferable for a different judge to deal with contempt proceedings – whether witness should be afforded opportunity to be heard Legislation Cited: Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW), s 15A Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 128(3), 128(4), 128(5) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 119(2) Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW), Pt 55, Div 3, rr 3, 11(1), 11(6) Cases Cited: European Asian Bank AG v Wentworth (1986) 5 NSWLR 445 In the Matter of Steven Smith (No. 2) [2015] NSWSC 1141 In the matter of the Compensation Court of NSW (Court of Appeal (NSW), 20 December 1985, unrep) Jane Doe 1 v Dowling [2017] NSWSC 57 Keeley v Brooking (1979) 143 CLR 162; [1979] HCA 28 Pelechowski v Registrar, Court of Appeal (NSW) (1999) 198 CLR 435; [1999] HCA 19 Principal Registrar of Supreme Court of NSW v Thanh Vu Tran [2006] NSWSC 1183; (2006) 166 A Crim R 393 R v Coskun (No 4) [2022] NSWSC 696 Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales v Dangerfield [2016] NSWCA 277 R v Diallo & Ors (No 7) [2024] NSWSC 978 R v Qaumi & Ors (No 62) [2016] NSWSC 1215 R v Taber and Styman; Re Shannon v Styman [2005] NSWSC 1329 R v WE (No.15) [2020] NSWSC 332 Registrar of Court of Appeal v Maniam (No 1) (1991) 25 NSWLR 459 The King v Metal Trades Employers' Association; Ex parte Amalgamated Engineering Union (1951) 82 CLR 208; [1951] HCA 3 Texts Cited: N/A Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Rex (Prosecution) Ibrahima Diallo (Defendant) AG (Defendant) AD (Defendant) Panashe Morgan Ryan Karise (Defendant) KL (Alleged Contemnor) Representation: Counsel: E Balodis (Rex) R Wilson SC (Diallo) M Avenell SC (AG) B Robinson (AD) M Smith (Karise) M Fernando (KL)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate